首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders >Pain and Pain Catastrophizing Among Internal Medicine Outpatients With Borderline Personality Symptomatology: A Cross-Sectional Self-Report Survey
【2h】

Pain and Pain Catastrophizing Among Internal Medicine Outpatients With Borderline Personality Symptomatology: A Cross-Sectional Self-Report Survey

机译:边缘人格症状内科门诊患​​者的疼痛和痛苦灾难性研究:跨部门自我报告调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: The extant literature indicates that individuals with borderline personality disorder generally report higher levels of pain than individuals without this disorder. This study examined relationships between borderline personality symptomatology, pain, and pain catastrophizing (a related aspect of the pain experience).>Method: Using a cross-sectional consecutive sample of internal medicine outpatients (N = 238) and a self-report survey methodology, we examined relationships between borderline personality symptomatology as measured by the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire–4 and the Self-Harm Inventory; pain levels “now,” “over the past week,” and “over the past year”; and scores on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and its subscales (rumination, magnification, helplessness). Data were collected during November 2012.>Results: Scores on both measures of borderline personality disorder individually exhibited statistically significant correlations with self-reported pain levels at the time of the survey, during the past week, and over the past year (P < .001), as well as with total scores on the PCS and each of its subscales (P < .001). Participants who were positive on both measures of borderline personality disorder (a conservative indicator of borderline personality disorder) also demonstrated statistically significantly higher pain ratings now, over the past week, and over the past year, as well as higher scores on the total PCS (P < .001) compared with those who were negative on both measures or scored positively on only 1 measure.>Conclusions: Regardless of the measure used, individuals with borderline personality disorder symptomatology consistently demonstrated higher pain scores at all time points, as well as higher levels of pain catastrophizing.
机译:>目的:现有文献表明,边缘性人格障碍患者的疼痛程度普遍高于无此障碍的人。这项研究调查了边缘人格症状,疼痛和疼痛灾难性(疼痛经历的相关方面)之间的关系。>方法:使用横断面连续的内科门诊患​​者(N = 238)和作为一种自我报告调查方法,我们检查了由人格诊断问卷-4测得的临界人格症状与自我伤害量表之间的关系。 “现在”,“过去一周”和“过去一年”的疼痛程度;并按疼痛灾难性量表(PCS)及其子量表(沉思,放大,无助)评分。在2012年11月收集了数据。>结果:两种边缘性人格障碍测验的得分在调查时,过去一周以及整个调查期间与自我报告的疼痛水平分别显示出统计学显着的相关性。过去一年(P <.001),以及PCS及其每个子量表的总分(P <.001)。两项对边缘性人格障碍指标(边缘性人格障碍的保守指标)均呈阳性的参与者,在过去一周和过去一年中,也显示出统计学上显着更高的疼痛评分,并且在总PCS评分上也更高( P <.001)与两项指标均阴性或仅一项指标阳性的人相比。>结论:无论采用哪种指标,边缘性人格障碍症状患者始终表现出更高的疼痛评分时间点,以及更高程度的痛苦灾难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号