首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders >A Quick Test of Cognitive Speed for Comparing Processing Speed to Differentiate Adult Psychiatric Referrals With and Without Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders
【2h】

A Quick Test of Cognitive Speed for Comparing Processing Speed to Differentiate Adult Psychiatric Referrals With and Without Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders

机译:认知速度的快速测试用于比较处理速度以区分有或没有注意力缺陷/多动障碍的成人精神科转诊

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: This retrospective study used A Quick Test of Cognitive Speed (AQT) to compare processing speed and efficiency measures by adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or non-ADHD psychiatric disorders and healthy controls.>Method: Color, form, and color-form combination naming tests were administered to 104 adults, ages 17–55 years, referred for psychiatric evaluation of possible ADHD. Thirty healthy adults were controls. Psychiatric intake procedures identified 64 adults with ADHD (ICD-10 and DSM-IV criteria) and 40 with mild psychiatric disorders without ADHD. The study was conducted from 2008 through 2010.>Results: At intake, color, form, and color-form combination naming times (seconds) were longer and overhead [color-form combination – (color + form)] was larger for patients with ADHD than for non-ADHD patients and controls. In the ADHD group, color and form measures were in the normal range. Color-form combination was in the slower-than-normal speed (60–70 seconds) and overhead, a processing-efficiency measure, in the atypical range (> 10 seconds). In the non-ADHD patient and control groups, all AQT measures were in the normal range. Analysis of variance with post hoc analysis of log-normal values for color, form, and color-form combination and time for overhead indicated significant (Bonferroni P < .01) mean differences between the ADHD and other groups, but not between the non-ADHD and control groups. When using fail criteria for either color-form combination or overhead, the sensitivity for the ADHD group was 89%.>Conclusions: Results support AQT as a possible complement to psychiatric intake procedures to differentiate adults with ADHD from those with mild psychiatric disorders, and they suggest that a controlled prospective study might be productive.
机译:>目的:该回顾性研究使用认知速度快速测试(AQT)来比较患有注意力缺陷/多动症(ADHD)或非ADHD精神病的成年人和健康对照者的处理速度和效率指标。>方法:对104位年龄在17-55岁之间的成年人进行了颜色,形式和颜色形式组合命名测试,以进行可能的ADHD的精神病学评估。三十名健康成年人为对照。精神病学摄入程序确定了64位患有ADHD的成年人(ICD-10和DSM-IV标准)和40位患有轻度精神病而没有ADHD的成年人。该研究从2008年到2010年进行。>结果:在摄入时,颜色,形状和颜色形式组合的命名时间(秒)更长,开销更大[颜色形式组合–(颜色+形式)与非多动症患者和对照组相比,多动症患者的[]更大。在ADHD组中,颜色和形态指标在正常范围内。颜色形式组合的速度低于正常速度(60-70秒),开销(非常规范围)(> 10秒)是处理效率的度量。在非ADHD患者和对照组中,所有AQT量度均在正常范围内。用事后分析对颜色,形式和颜色形式组合的对数正态值以及开销时间进行方差分析表明,ADHD与其他组之间的均值差异显着(Bonferroni P <.01),但非多动症和对照组。当将失败标准用于颜色形式组合或开销时,ADHD组的敏感性为89%。>结论:结果支持AQT作为可能的补充精神疾病摄入程序的方法,以区分ADHD成人和成人患有轻度精神病的患者,他们建议进行对照的前瞻性研究可能会有帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号