【2h】

There is no fitness but fitness and the lineage is its bearer

机译:除了健身没有别的健身血统是它的载体

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Inclusive fitness has been the cornerstone of social evolution theory for more than a half-century and has matured as a mathematical theory in the past 20 years. Yet surprisingly for a theory so central to an entire field, some of its connections to evolutionary theory more broadly remain contentious or underappreciated. In this paper, we aim to emphasize the connection between inclusive fitness and modern evolutionary theory through the following fact: inclusive fitness is simply classical Darwinian fitness, averaged over social, environmental and demographic states that members of a gene lineage experience. Therefore, inclusive fitness is neither a generalization of classical fitness, nor does it belong exclusively to the individual. Rather, the lineage perspective emphasizes that evolutionary success is determined by the effect of selection on all biological and environmental contexts that a lineage may experience. We argue that this understanding of inclusive fitness based on gene lineages provides the most illuminating and accurate picture and avoids pitfalls in interpretation and empirical applications of inclusive fitness theory.
机译:过去半个多世纪以来,包容性健身一直是社会进化理论的基石,并且在过去的20年中已经发展成为一种数学理论。然而,令人惊讶的是,对于一个在整个领域如此重要的理论,它与进化论的某些联系在更广泛的范围内仍然存在争议或未被重视。在本文中,我们旨在通过以下事实来强调包容性适应度与现代进化理论之间的联系:包容性适应度只是经典的达尔文式适应度,是在基因谱系成员所经历的社会,环境和人口统计状态下的平均值。因此,包容性适应既不是经典适应性的概括,也不是完全属于个人的。相反,沿袭观点强调进化成功取决于选择对沿袭可能经历的所有生物和环境环境的影响。我们认为,基于基因谱系的对包容性适应性的理解提供了最有启发性和最准确的描述,并避免了对包容性适应性理论的解释和经验应用的陷阱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号