【2h】

Unitary or unified taxonomy?

机译:统一或统一分类法?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Taxonomic data form a substantial, but scattered, resource. The alternative to such a fragmented system is a 'unitary' one of preferred, consensual classifications. For effective access and distribution the (Web) revision for a given taxon would be established at a single Internet site. Although all the international codes of nomenclature currently preclude the Internet as a valid medium of publication, elements of unitary taxonomy (UT) still exist in the paper system. Much taxonomy, unitary or not, already resides on the Web. Arguments for and against adopting a unitary approach are considered and a resolution is attempted. Rendering taxonomy essentially Web-based is as inevitable as it is desirable. Apparently antithetical to the UT proposal is the view that in reality multiple classifications of the same taxon exist, since different taxonomists often hold different concepts of their taxa: a single name may apply to many different (frequently overlapping) circumscriptions and more than one name to a single taxon. However, novel means are being developed on single Internet sites to retain the diversity of multiple concepts for taxa, providing hope that taxonomy may become established as a Web-based information discipline that will unify the discipline and facilitate data access.
机译:分类数据构成了大量但分散的资源。这种零散的系统的替代方法是首选的,自愿的分类中的“单一”。为了有效地访问和分发,将在单个Internet站点上建立给定分类群的(Web)修订版。尽管当前所有国际术语命名法都将Internet排除为有效的发布媒介,但统一分类法(UT)的要素仍存在于纸张系统中。 Web上已经存在许多分类法,无论是否统一。考虑支持和反对采用统一方法的论点,并尝试解决。基本上基于Web的呈现分类法是不可避免的。显然与UT提案相反的观点是,实际上存在同一分类单元的多种分类,因为不同的分类学家通常持有不同的分类概念:一个名称可能适用于许多不同的(经常重叠)的限制条件,并且一个以上的名称适用于一个分类单元。但是,在单个Internet站点上正在开发新颖的方法来保留多种分类概念的多样性,希望将分类法建立为基于Web的信息学科,以统一该学科并促进数据访问。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号