首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Pain Research Management >Gabapentin versus Transdermal Fentanyl Matrix for the Alleviation of Chronic Neuropathic Pain of Radicular Origin: A Randomized Blind Multicentered Parallel-Group Noninferiority Trial
【2h】

Gabapentin versus Transdermal Fentanyl Matrix for the Alleviation of Chronic Neuropathic Pain of Radicular Origin: A Randomized Blind Multicentered Parallel-Group Noninferiority Trial

机译:加巴喷丁vs透皮芬太尼基质缓解的根源性慢性神经性疼痛:一项随机盲多中心平行组非劣效性试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A number of studies have been published proposing various approaches to the treatment of neuropathic pain; however, to our knowledge, no attempts have been made to compare gabapentin and fentanyl in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. We evaluated the relative efficacy and safety of fentanyl matrix and gabapentin for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain of radicular origin. The study was designed as a randomized blind multicentered parallel-group noninferiority trial. A total of 108 patients with moderate-to-severe pain (≥4 intensity on an 11-point numeric rating scale) were randomly prescribed either fentanyl matrix or gabapentin over a period of 56 days. In the primary analysis, the noninferiority of fentanyl matrix treatment was evaluated in relation to the efficacy of gabapentin based on the pain intensity difference (PID) at 56 days after the first dose of the drugs. Secondary endpoints included pain relief, improvement in functional status (the Korean-Oswestry Disability Index (K-ODI)), improvement in depressive symptoms (Korean-Beck Depression Index (K-BDI)) between the 28th and 56th day, and adverse events (AEs). Analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint established the noninferiority of fentanyl matrix compared with gabapentin, with no statistically significant difference observed in the PID after 56 days for the two treatment groups. Similarly, analysis of pain relief revealed no significant differences between the groups on days 28 and 56. There was no difference in the K-ODI and K-BDI between the groups during the study period. The overall incidence of at least one AE was similar for fentanyl matrix (67.3%) and gabapentin (69.6%). The most commonly reported AEs for patients treated with fentanyl matrix and gabapentin included dizziness (30.8% vs. 44.6%, respectively), somnolence (26.9% vs. 35.7%), and constipation (15.4% vs. 17.9%). This study demonstrated that the analgesic effect of fentanyl matrix is noninferior in comparison with gabapentin and supports the use of fentanyl matrix as an effective and safe treatment for moderate-to-severe chronic neuropathic pain. This trial is registered with .
机译:已经发表了许多研究,提出了多种治疗神经性疼痛的方法。然而,据我们所知,尚未尝试比较加巴喷丁和芬太尼用于腰椎神经根病患者。我们评估了芬太尼基质和加巴喷丁治疗根源性慢性神经性疼痛的相对疗效和安全性。该研究被设计为随机盲多中心平行组非劣效性试验。在56天内,总共108例中度至重度疼痛患者(在11点数字量表中≥4的疼痛)随机分配了芬太尼基质或加巴喷丁。在初步分析中,根据首次给药后56天的疼痛强度差(PID),评估了与加巴喷丁疗效相关的芬太尼基质治疗的不劣性。次要终点包括疼痛缓解,功能状态改善(韩国-奥斯威氏残疾指数(K-ODI)),第28天至第56天之间的抑郁症状(韩国-贝克抑郁指数(K-BDI))改善以及不良事件(AEs)。对主要功效终点的分析确定了与加巴喷丁相比芬太尼基质的非劣效性,两个治疗组在56天后的PID均未观察到统计学上的显着差异。同样,对疼痛缓解的分析显示,第28天和第56天两组之间没有显着差异。在研究期间,两组之间的K-ODI和K-BDI也没有差异。芬太尼基质(67.3%)和加巴喷丁(69.6%)的至少一种AE的总发生率相似。芬太尼基质和加巴喷丁治疗的患者最常报告的不良事件包括头晕(分别为30.8%和44.6%),嗜睡(26.9%和35.7%)和便秘(15.4%和17.9%)。这项研究表明,与加巴喷丁相比,芬太尼基质的镇痛作用不逊色,并支持使用芬太尼基质作为中重度慢性神经性疼痛的有效且安全的治疗方法。此试用版已在进行注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号