首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Orthopedic Reviews >Comparison of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block Caudal Epidural Block and Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia in Pain Control After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Study
【2h】

Comparison of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block Caudal Epidural Block and Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia in Pain Control After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Study

机译:全髋关节置换术后疼痛控制中连续股神经阻滞尾硬膜外阻滞和静脉内自控镇痛的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Thirty-six patients who underwent primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) were randomly allocated to 4 groups with different pain control protocols; continuous femoral nerve block (FNB group), single-shot caudal epidural block with morphine (EB group), intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl (IV-PCA group), and systemic administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs group). Postoperative pain was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS) scores and the analgesic effect was compared among the groups. The NRS upon arrival at the recovery room and 6 hours after surgery in the FNB, EB, and IV-PCA groups were significantly lower than that in the NSAIDs group. The amount of additional analgesics requested by the patient was smaller in the FNB, EB, and IV-PCA groups as compared to the NSAIDs group. Regarding the complications related to the analgesia, 5 of the 9 patients in the IV-PCA group complained nausea and vomiting and received antiemetic drugs. Delay in the rehabilitation process due to drowsiness was encountered in 3 patients in this group, while no patient in the FNB and EB groups suffered from delayed rehabilitation. Considering both the analgesic effect and the potential risk of complications, continuous femoral nerve blocks and caudal epidural blocks for are recommended for postoperative pain control after THA procedure.
机译:36例行原发性单侧全髋关节置换术(THA)的患者被随机分为4组,分别采用不同的疼痛控制方案。连续股神经阻滞(FNB组),单次硬膜外麻醉联合吗啡(EB组),静脉内自控芬太尼镇痛(IV-PCA组)和非甾体抗炎药的全身给药(NSAIDs组)。使用数字评分量表(NRS)评分评估术后疼痛,并比较各组的镇痛效果。 FNB,EB和IV-PCA组到达康复室时和手术后6小时的NRS显着低于NSAIDs组。与NSAIDs组相比,FNB,EB和IV-PCA组患者要求的其他止痛药数量较少。关于与镇痛有关的并发症,IV-PCA组的9例患者中有5例抱怨恶心和呕吐,并服用了止吐药。该组中有3例患者由于困倦而导致康复过程延迟,而FNB和EB组中没有患者遭受延迟康复。考虑到止痛效果和潜在的并发症风险,建议在THA手术后进行连续股神经阻滞和尾硬膜外阻滞,以控制术后疼痛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号