首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Oncotarget >Consensus molecular subtypes classification of colorectal cancer as a predictive factor for chemotherapeutic efficacy against metastatic colorectal cancer
【2h】

Consensus molecular subtypes classification of colorectal cancer as a predictive factor for chemotherapeutic efficacy against metastatic colorectal cancer

机译:大肠癌的共识分子亚型分类作为转移性大肠癌化疗疗效的预测因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) classification is one of the most robust colorectal cancer (CRC) classifications based on comprehensive gene expression profiles. This study aimed to clarify whether the CMS is a predictive factor for therapeutic effects of standard chemotherapies for metastatic CRC (mCRC). We retrospectively enrolled 193 patients with mCRCs, and using comprehensive gene expression data, classified them into 4 subtypes: CMS1–CMS4. The associations between the subtypes and treatment outcomes were analyzed. Regarding first-line chemotherapy, irinotecan (IRI)-based chemotherapy was significantly superior to oxaliplatin (OX)-based chemotherapy for progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13–0.64) and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.19–0.99) in CMS4. Regarding the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) therapy, CMS1 showed particularly worse PFS (HR = 2.50, 95% CI 1.31–4.39) and OS (HR = 4.23, 95% CI 1.83–9.04), and CMS2 showed particularly good PFS (HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.44–1.01) and OS (HR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.27–0.87) compared with the other subtypes. The biological characteristics of CMS may influence the efficacy of chemotherapy. CMS might be a new predictive factor for the efficacy of chemotherapy against mCRCs.
机译:基于全面的基因表达谱,共有分子亚型(CMS)分类是最强大的结直肠癌(CRC)分类之一。这项研究旨在阐明CMS是否是转移性CRC(mCRC)标准化学疗法的治疗效果的预测因素。我们回顾性研究了193例mCRC患者,并使用全面的基因表达数据将其分为4种亚型:CMS1-CMS4。分析了亚型与治疗结果之间的关联。对于一线化疗,以伊立替康(IRI)为基础的化疗对于无进展生存期(PFS;危险比[HR] = 0.31,95%置信区间[CI]为0.13-0.64)明显优于以奥沙利铂(OX)为基础的化疗。 )和CMS4的总体生存率(OS; HR = 0.45,95%CI 0.19-0.99)。关于抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)治疗,CMS1表现出特别差的PFS(HR = 2.50,95%CI 1.31–4.39)和OS(HR = 4.23,95%CI 1.83–9.04),CMS2显示与其他亚型相比,PFS(HR = 0.67,95%CI 0.44–1.01)和OS(HR = 0.49,95%CI 0.27–0.87)特别好。 CMS的生物学特性可能影响化学疗法的功效。 CMS可能是针对mCRC的化学疗法疗效的新预测因子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号