首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Oncotarget >Can computer-aided diagnosis assist in the identification of prostate cancer on prostate MRI? a multi-center multi-reader investigation
【2h】

Can computer-aided diagnosis assist in the identification of prostate cancer on prostate MRI? a multi-center multi-reader investigation

机译:计算机辅助诊断能否帮助在前列腺MRI上识别前列腺癌?多中心多读者的调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

For prostate cancer detection on prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems aim to widely improve standardization across radiologists and centers. Our goal was to evaluate CAD assistance in prostate cancer detection compared with conventional mpMRI interpretation in a diverse dataset acquired from five institutions tested by nine readers of varying experience levels, in total representing 14 globally spread institutions.Index lesion sensitivities of mpMRI-alone were 79% (whole prostate (WP)), 84% (peripheral zone (PZ)), 71% (transition zone (TZ)), similar to CAD at 76% (WP, p=0.39), 77% (PZ, p=0.07), 79% (TZ, p=0.15). Greatest CAD benefit was in TZ for moderately-experienced readers at PI-RADSv2 <3 (84% vs mpMRI-alone 67%, p=0.055). Detection agreement was unchanged but CAD-assisted read times improved (4.6 vs 3.4 minutes, p<0.001). At PI-RADSv2 ≥ 3, CAD improved patient-level specificity (72%) compared to mpMRI-alone (45%, p<0.001).PI-RADSv2 and CAD-assisted mpMRI interpretations have similar sensitivities across multiple sites and readers while CAD has potential to improve specificity and moderately-experienced radiologists’ detection of more difficult tumors in the center of the gland. The multi-institutional evidence provided is essential to future prostate MRI and CAD development.
机译:对于前列腺多参数MRI(mpMRI)上的前列腺癌检测,前列腺成像报告和数据系统版本2(PI-RADSv2)和计算机辅助诊断(CAD)系统旨在广泛提高放射科医生和中心的标准化程度。我们的目标是在从9个经验水平各异的读者的5个机构中获得的多样化数据集中,评估与常规mpMRI解释相比的CAD协助与常规mpMRI解释,总共代表14个全球分布的机构。仅mpMRI的指数病变敏感性为79 %(整个前列腺(WP)),84%(外周区(PZ)),71%(过渡区(TZ)),与CAD相似,为76%(WP,p = 0.39),77%(PZ,p = 0.07),79%(TZ,p = 0.15)。对于PI-RADSv2 <3的中级经验读者,最大的CAD益处是在TZ中(84%比仅mpMRI的67%,p = 0.055)。检测协议没有变化,但CAD辅助的读取时间有所改善(4.6对3.4分钟,p <0.001)。在PI-RADSv2≥3的情况下,与仅使用mpMRI的患者(45%,p <0.001)相比,CAD改善了患者水平的特异性(72%)。PI-RADSv2和CAD辅助的mpMRI解释在多个部位和阅读器上的敏感性相似,而CAD具有提高特异性的潜力,并且有经验的放射线医师可以检测到腺体中心较困难的肿瘤。提供的多机构证据对于未来前列腺MRI和CAD的发展至关重要。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号