首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>OncoTargets and therapy >Can involved-field irradiation replace elective nodal irradiation in chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Can involved-field irradiation replace elective nodal irradiation in chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:在食管癌的放化疗中累加场照射能否代替选择性淋巴结照射?系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Chemoradiotherapy is the most common treatment for inoperable esophageal cancer. However, there is no consensus on the delineation of the clinical target volume. Elective nodal irradiation (ENI) is recommended for inoperable esophageal cancer. A few studies have reported a decrease in the incidence of radiation-related toxicity of involved-field irradiation (IFI) for esophageal cancer. A systematic review and pooled analysis were performed to determine whether IFI in definitive chemoradiotherapy was more beneficial than ENI for esophageal cancer. The results showed no significant differences in the overall survival and local control rates between the IFI and ENI arms. Meanwhile, the incidences of esophageal and lung toxicities were significantly decreased in the IFI arm. These results suggest that IFI is a feasible treatment option for locally advanced esophageal cancer, especially to minimize irradiation-related toxicity.
机译:化学放疗是无法手术的食道癌的最常见治疗方法。但是,关于临床目标量的划分尚无共识。对于不能手术的食管癌,建议采用选择性淋巴结照射(ENI)。几项研究报道了食管癌累及场辐射(IFI)的与辐射有关的毒性发生率降低。进行了系统的审查和汇总分析,以确定在明确的放化疗中,IFI是否比ENI对食道癌更有益。结果表明,IFI和ENI组之间的​​总体生存率和局部控制率没有显着差异。同时,IFI组的食管和肺毒性发生率显着降低。这些结果表明,IFI是局部晚期食管癌的可行治疗选择,尤其是最大程度地降低了与辐射相关的毒性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号