首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Ochsner Journal >Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Grades 1-2: Patient-Reported Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Utility Analysis
【2h】

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Grades 1-2: Patient-Reported Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Utility Analysis

机译:微创与开放式经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合治疗退行性脊椎滑脱1-2级:患者报告的临床结果和成本-效用分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundTransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is the standard surgical treatment for patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis who do not respond to a 6-week course of conservative therapy. A number of morbidities are associated with the conventional open-TLIF method, so minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques for TLIF (MIS-TLIF) have been introduced to reduce the trauma to paraspinal muscles and hasten postoperative recovery. Because providing cost-effective medical treatment is a core initiative of healthcare reforms, a comparison of open-TLIF and MIS-TLIF must include a cost-utility analysis in addition to an analysis of clinical effectiveness.
机译:背景经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)是对6周疗程的保守治疗无反应的腰椎退行性腰椎滑脱症的标准手术治疗方法。传统的开放式TLIF方法与多种疾病相关,因此,针对TLIF的微创手术(MIS)技术(MIS-TLIF)已被引入以减少对椎旁肌肉的创伤并加速术后恢复。由于提供具有成本效益的医疗服务是医疗保健改革的一项核心举措,因此,对开放式TLIF和MIS-TLIF进行比较时,除了要对临床效果进行分析之外,还必须包括成本效用分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号