首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nutrients >Explicit and Implicit Approach vs. Avoidance Tendencies towards High vs. Low Calorie Food Cues in Patients with Obesity and Active Binge Eating Disorder
【2h】

Explicit and Implicit Approach vs. Avoidance Tendencies towards High vs. Low Calorie Food Cues in Patients with Obesity and Active Binge Eating Disorder

机译:肥胖和活动性暴食症患者的显式和隐式方法与避免高热量食物线索与低热量食物线索的倾向

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Patients with binge eating disorder (BED) suffer from regular food binges with loss of control. This may be due to dysfunctional approach vs. avoidance tendencies towards food in BED. We applied an approach-avoidance task (AAT), in which n = 24 patients with obesity and active BED (OB-BED), n = 32 patients with obesity without current BED (OB), and n = 25 healthy controls (CO) either approached (“pulled”) or avoided (“pushed”) high (HC) vs. low calorie (LC) food pictures. We tested the hypothesis that OB-BED patients would show an approach bias (measured as different response times RT) towards HC food compared to the other groups. While there was no main effect for group or direction of movement, a significant main effect for calorie (p < 0.001; RT for HC significantly slower than for LC) was found. Repeated measures ANOVA (rm-ANOVA) for comparison of OB-BED vs. OB vs. CO revealed a significant three-fold interaction group × direction × calorie (p = 0.02). Against our hypothesis, the OB-BED group showed an avoidance bias for LC. In explicit ratings, OB-BED reported a significantly reduced urge to consume LC food compared to the OB group. Similar to OB-BED, CO also showed an avoidance bias for LC. The implications of our results are discussed and future directions in this field of research are presented.
机译:暴饮暴食症(BED)的患者会受到常规食物刺激而失去控制。这可能是由于功能失调与BED中避免食用食物的趋势有关。我们应用了避免接触方法(AAT),其中n = 24例肥胖且有活动性BED的患者(OB-BED),n = 32例没有当前BED的肥胖患者(OB),n = 25个健康对照(CO)接近(“拉动”)或避免(“推动”)高(HC)与低卡路里(LC)食物图片。我们检验了以下假设:与其他组相比,OB-BED患者将显示出对HC食品的进近偏倚(以不同的反应时间RT来衡量)。虽然对组或运动方向没有主要影响,但发现热量具有显着的主要影响(p <0.001; HC的RT明显慢于LC)。重复测量方差分析(rm-ANOVA)进行OB-BED与OB与CO的比较,发现存在显着的三倍相互作用组×方向×卡路里(p = 0.02)。根据我们的假设,OB-BED组显示出LC的回避倾向。在明确评分中,与OB组相比,OB-BED报告的食用LC食品的冲动明显减少。与OB-BED相似,CO也显示出LC的避免偏差。讨论了我们的研究结果的含义,并提出了该研究领域的未来方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号