首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nutrients >Evaluation of a Mobile Phone Image-Based Dietary Assessment Method in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes
【2h】

Evaluation of a Mobile Phone Image-Based Dietary Assessment Method in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes

机译:基于手机图像的饮食评估方法对2型糖尿病成年人的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Image-based dietary records have limited evidence evaluating their performance and use among adults with a chronic disease. This study evaluated the performance of a 3-day mobile phone image-based dietary record, the Nutricam Dietary Assessment Method (NuDAM), in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Criterion validity was determined by comparing energy intake (EI) with total energy expenditure (TEE) measured by the doubly-labelled water technique. Relative validity was established by comparison to a weighed food record (WFR). Inter-rater reliability was assessed by comparing estimates of intake from three dietitians. Ten adults (6 males, age: 61.2 ± 6.9 years old, BMI: 31.0 ± 4.5 kg/m2) participated. Compared to TEE, mean EI (MJ/day) was significantly under-reported using both methods, with a mean ratio of EI:TEE 0.76 ± 0.20 for the NuDAM and 0.76 ± 0.17 for the WFR. Correlations between the NuDAM and WFR were mostly moderate for energy (r = 0.57), carbohydrate (g/day) (r = 0.63, p < 0.05), protein (g/day) (r = 0.78, p < 0.01) and alcohol (g/day) (rs = 0.85, p < 0.01), with a weaker relationship for fat (g/day) (r = 0.24). Agreement between dietitians for nutrient intake for the 3-day NuDAM (Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) = 0.77–0.99) was lower when compared with the 3-day WFR (ICC = 0.82–0.99). These findings demonstrate the performance and feasibility of the NuDAM to assess energy and macronutrient intake in a small sample. Some modifications to the NuDAM could improve efficiency and an evaluation in a larger group of adults with T2DM is required.
机译:基于图像的饮食记录在评估其在慢性病成年人中的表现和使用的证据有限。这项研究评估了2天糖尿病(T2DM)成年人的3天基于手机图像的饮食记录,即Nutricam饮食评估方法(NuDAM)。通过将能量摄入量(EI)与通过双标记水技术测量的总能量消耗量(TEE)进行比较来确定标准的有效性。通过与称量食物记录(WFR)进行比较来确定相对有效性。通过比较三个营养师的摄入量评估来评估评定者之间的可靠性。参加了十名成年人(6名男性,年龄:61.2±6.9​​岁,BMI:31.0±4.5 kg / m 2 )。与TEE相比,两种方法的平均EI(MJ /天)均被低估,NuDAM的EI:TEE的平均比率为0.76±0.20,WFR的平均比率为0.76±0.17。 NuDAM和WFR之间的相关性在能量(r = 0.57),碳水化合物(g / day)(r = 0.63,p <0.05),蛋白质(g / day)(r = 0.78,p <0.01)和酒精方面大多中等(g /天)(rs = 0.85,p <0.01),与脂肪的关系较弱(g / day)(r = 0.24)。营养学家之间为期3天的NuDAM(类内相关系数(ICC)= 0.77–0.99)的营养摄入量协议与3天WFR(ICC = 0.82–0.99)相比较低。这些发现证明了NuDAM评估小样本能量和大量营养素摄入的性能和可行性。对NuDAM进行一些修改可以提高效率,并且需要对更多的T2DM成人进行评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号