首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nucleic Acids Research >Analysis of cell-cycle gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using microarrays and multiple synchronization methods
【2h】

Analysis of cell-cycle gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using microarrays and multiple synchronization methods

机译:利用微阵列和多种同步方法分析酿酒酵母中细胞周期基因的表达

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Microarray analysis of gene expression during the yeast division cycle has led to the proposal that a significant number of genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are expressed in a cell-cycle-specific manner. Four different methods of synchronization were used for cell-cycle analysis. Randomized data exhibit periodic patterns of lesser strength than the experimental data. Thus the cyclicities in the expression measurements in the four experiments presented do not arise from chance fluctuations or noise in the data. However, when the degree of cyclicity for genes in different experiments are compared, a large degree of non-reproducibility is found. Re-examining the phase timing of peak expression, we find that three of the experiments (those using α-factor, CDC28 and CDC15 synchronization) show consistent patterns of phasing, but the elutriation synchrony results demonstrate a different pattern from the other arrest-release synchronization methods. Specific genes can show a wide range of cyclical behavior between different experiments; a gene with high cyclicity in one experiment can show essentially no cyclicity in another experiment. The elutriation experiment, possibly being the least perturbing of the four synchronization methods, may give the most accurate characterization of the state of gene expression during the normal, unperturbed cell cycle. Under this alternative explanation, the observed cyclicities in the other three experiments are a stress response to synchronization, and may not reproduce in unperturbed cells.
机译:酵母分裂周期中基因表达的微阵列分析导致了这样的提议,即酿酒酵母中大量基因以细胞周期特异性方式表达。四种不同的同步方法用于细胞周期分析。随机数据表现出比实验数据强度低的周期性模式。因此,在所提出的四个实验中,表达测量的周期性不是由偶然的波动或数据中的噪声引起的。但是,当比较不同实验中基因的周期性程度时,发现很大程度的不可重复性。重新检查峰值表达的相位时序,我们发现其中三个实验(使用α因子,CDC28和CDC15同步的实验)显示一致的定相模式,但淘析同步结果显示出与其他捕获释放不同的模式同步方法。特定基因在不同实验之间可以表现出广泛的周期性行为。一个实验中具有高循环性的基因在另一项实验中基本上没有循环性。淘洗实验,可能是四种同步方法中干扰最小的一种,可以在正常,不受干扰的细胞周期中最准确地表征基因表达的状态。根据这种替代性解释,在其他三个实验中观察到的周期性是对同步的压力响应,并且可能不会在不受干扰的细胞中繁殖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号