首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Dose-Response >A Certified Health Physicist’s Reflections on a 40-Year Career in Radiation Protection
【2h】

A Certified Health Physicist’s Reflections on a 40-Year Career in Radiation Protection

机译:一位经过认证的健康医师对放射防护40年职业的思考

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This is a reflection from a certified health physicist regarding his becoming aware, during his 40-year career, that the linear no-threshold (LNT) model and the associated As Low As Reasonably Achievable concept have no scientific basis and make no positive contribution to radiation safety. They should be replaced by an alternative, scientifically based model that includes a threshold, below which there is no harm, and recognition of hormesis and the adaptive response, which reflect the benefits of low-dose and low-dose-rate radiation exposure. Continued use of the unscientific LNT model is not conservative, as most regulators complacently claim but actually harmful. Examples of these harmful impacts in the areas of nuclear power, nuclear medicine, and environmental management are included.
机译:这是从一位注册健康物理学家的身上反映出来的,他认识到他在40年的职业生涯中,线性无阈值(LNT)模型和相关的“尽可能合理地实现”概念没有科学依据,并且对辐射安全。应该用替代的,基于科学的模型代替它们,该模型包括一个阈值(低于此阈值不会造成伤害)以及对兴奋剂和适应性反应的认识,这些都反映了低剂量和低剂量率辐射暴露的益处。继续使用不科学的LNT模型并不保守,因为大多数监管机构都自满地宣称,但实际上是有害的。其中包括在核电,核医学和环境管理领域的这些有害影响的例子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号