首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment >The noradrenergic paradox: implications in the management of depression and anxiety
【2h】

The noradrenergic paradox: implications in the management of depression and anxiety

机译:肾上腺素能悖论:对抑郁症和焦虑症的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Both major depressive disorder and the anxiety disorders are major causes of disability and markedly contribute to a significant global burden of the disease worldwide. In part because of the significant socioeconomic burden associated with these disorders, theories have been developed to specifically build clinical treatment approaches. One such theory, the monoaminergic hypothesis, has led to the development of several generations of selective and nonselective inhibitors of transporters of serotonin and norepinephrine, with the goal of augmenting monoaminergic transmission. These efforts have led to considerable success in the development of antidepressant therapeutics. However, there is a strong correlation between enhanced noradrenergic activity and fear and anxiety. Consequently, some physicians have expressed concerns that the same enhanced noradrenergic activity that alleviates depression could also promote anxiety. The fact that the serotonergic and noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors are successfully used in the treatment of anxiety and panic disorders seems paradoxical. This review was undertaken to determine if any clinical evidence exists to show that serotonergic and noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors can cause anxiety. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched, and the results limited to randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies performed in nongeriatric adults and with clear outcome measures were reported. Based on these criteria, a total of 52 studies were examined. Patients in these studies suffered from depression or anxiety disorders (generalized and social anxiety disorders, panic disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder). The large majority of these studies employed venlafaxine or duloxetine, and the remainder used tri-cyclic antidepressants, atomoxetine, or reboxetine. All the studies reported clinically significant alleviation of depressive and/or anxious symptoms by these therapeutics. In none of these studies was anxiety a treatment-emergent adverse effect. This review argues against the impression that enhanced generalized noradrenergic activity promotes the emergence of anxiety.
机译:重度抑郁症和焦虑症都是致残的主要原因,并且显着地造成了全球范围内该疾病的巨大全球负担。部分由于与这些疾病相关的巨大社会经济负担,已经开发了专门构建临床治疗方法的理论。一种这样的理论,即单胺能假说,已导致开发了几代选择性和非选择性的5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素转运蛋白抑制剂,目的是增强单胺能传递。这些努力在抗抑郁疗法的开发中取得了相当大的成功。但是,增强的去甲肾上腺素能活动与恐惧和焦虑之间存在很强的相关性。因此,一些医生表示担心,减轻抑郁症的增强的去甲肾上腺素能活动也可能促进焦虑。血清素能和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂已成功用于治疗焦虑症和恐慌症,这似乎是自相矛盾的。进行了这项审查,以确定是否存在任何临床证据表明血清素能和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂会引起焦虑。搜索PubMed,EMBASE和Cochrane库数据库,并报道了仅限于在非老年患者中进行的,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照研究且结果明确的结果。基于这些标准,共检查了52项研究。这些研究中的患者患有抑郁症或焦虑症(普遍性和社交焦虑症,恐慌症和创伤后应激障碍)。这些研究中的绝大多数使用文拉法辛或度洛西汀,其余使用三环类抗抑郁药,阿莫西汀或瑞波西汀。所有研究都报告了通过这些疗法在临床上显着缓解了抑郁和/或焦虑症状。在这些研究中,没有一项是焦虑症引起的不良反应。这项评论反对这样的印象,即增强的广义去甲肾上腺素能活动促进焦虑的出现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号