首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research >Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Doppler USG and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and selective renal arteriography in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis
【2h】

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Doppler USG and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and selective renal arteriography in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis

机译:动脉粥样硬化性肾动脉狭窄患者的多普勒超声造影对比增强磁共振血管造影和选择性肾动脉造影的诊断准确性比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThere are many systemic complications of conventional selective renal arteriography (SRA), such as contrast-mediated nephropathy. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) and renal artery Doppler ultrasonography (DUSG) have been used increasingly for renal artery stenosis (RAS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of CE-MRA and DUSG as used for diagnosis of RAS.
机译:背景技术常规选择性肾动脉造影(SRA)有许多全身并发症,例如造影剂介导的肾病。对比增强磁共振血管造影(CE-MRA)和肾动脉多普勒超声检查(DUSG)已越来越多地用于肾动脉狭窄(RAS)。这项研究的目的是评估CE-MRA和DUSG用于RAS诊断的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号