首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientifica >Efficacy of Hi-Lo Evac Endotracheal Tube in Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Mechanically Ventilated Poisoned Patients
【2h】

Efficacy of Hi-Lo Evac Endotracheal Tube in Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Mechanically Ventilated Poisoned Patients

机译:Hi-Lo抽气气管插管在预防机械通气中毒患者的呼吸机相关性肺炎中的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common health care-associated infection. To prevent this complication, aspiration of subglottic secretions using Hi-Lo Evac endotracheal tube (Evac ETT) is a recommended intervention. However, there are some reports on Evac ETT dysfunction. We aimed to compare the incidence of VAP (per ventilated patients) in severely ill poisoned patients who were intubated using Evac ETT versus conventional endotracheal tubes (C-ETT) in our toxicology ICU. Materials and Methods. In this clinical randomized trial, 91 eligible patients with an expected duration of mechanical ventilation of more than 48 hours were recruited and randomly assigned into two groups: (1) subglottic secretion drainage (SSD) group who were intubated by Evac ETT (n = 43) and (2) control group who were intubated by C-ETT (n = 48). Results. Of the 91 eligible patients, 56 (61.5%) were male. VAP was detected in 24 of 43 (55.8%) patients in the case group and 23 of 48 (47.9%) patients in the control group (P = 0.45). The most frequently isolated microorganisms were S. aureus (54.10%) and Acinetobacter spp. (19.68%). The incidence of VAP and ICU length of stay were not significantly different between the two groups, but duration of intubation was statistically different and was longer in the SSD group. Mortality rate was less in SSD group but without a significant difference (P = 0.68). Conclusion. The SSD procedure was performed intermittently with one-hour intervals using 10 mL syringe. Subglottic secretion drainage does not significantly reduce the incidence of VAP in patients receiving MV. This strategy appears to be ineffective in preventing VAP among ICU patients.
机译:背景。呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)是最常见的卫生保健相关感染。为了防止这种并发症,建议使用Hi-Lo Evac气管导管(Evac ETT)抽吸声门下分泌物。但是,有一些关于Evac ETT功能障碍的报道。我们的目的是在我们的毒理学ICU中比较使用Evac ETT与常规气管插管(C-ETT)插管的重症中毒患者的VAP(每例通气患者)的发生率。材料和方法。在这项临床随机试验中,招募了91名合格的机械通气持续时间超过48小时的患者,并将其随机分为两组:(1)经Evac ETT插管的声门下分泌物引流(SSD)组(n = 43) )和(2)对照组,分别接受C-ETT插管(n = 48)。结果。在91例合格患者中,男性为56(61.5%)。在病例组的43名患者中有24名(55.8%)和对照组的48名患者中有23名(47.9%)检测到了VAP(P = 0.45)。最常分离的微生物是金黄色葡萄球菌(54.10%)和不动杆菌属。 (19.68%)。两组之间VAP的发生率和ICU住院时间没有显着差异,但插管持续时间有统计学差异,而SSD组更长。 SSD组的死亡率较低,但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.68)。结论。使用10 mL注射器以1小时间隔间歇执行SSD程序。声门下分泌物引流并不能显着降低接受MV的患者VAP的发生率。在ICU患者中预防VAP似乎无效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号