首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care >Relationship based care – how general practice developed and why it is undermined within contemporary healthcare systems
【2h】

Relationship based care – how general practice developed and why it is undermined within contemporary healthcare systems

机译:基于关系的护理-全科医疗如何发展以及为何在现代医疗体系中受到破坏

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: Investigating the state of generalism in medicine from the outlook of general practice.>Line of argument: General practice developed when its pioneers, in continuing relationships, learnt to know their patients through the variety of medical situations. From the 50s, there is an increasing literature on the virtues and challenges of relationship based general practice, and register-based research indicate its benefits. Generalist perspectives and person-centeredness are implemented in specialised care and medical education but need to be complemented by an input from relationship based general practice. The politically defined aim of primary care is not to balance the draw-backs of specialisation, but to provide medicine at the primary care level. In Sweden, and increasingly even in traditional strongholds of general practice, team-based primary care is thought to respond to increasing demands, filtering out non- and minor disease through triage, practicing task distribution, and moving the GP to a secondary level working with the ‘really sick’, in all a decline in direct contact between patient and GP.>Conclusions: When this happens, clinical medicine as a whole becomes drained of the practice of its human dimension. The lack of absolute proof of medical benefits cannot justify a disregard of the value of mutual knowledge and trust in the relationship, but still, in several countries, relationshipbased general practice will be hard to achieve for GPs planning their career. If the political winds should change, a sustaining profession of GPs preserving their relational ethos inside the team model, may be prepared to reform primary care. style="clear:both">KEY POINTS class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc">Proclaiming both biomedical breadth and the trustful relationship between doctor and patient, as a specialty, general practice embodies medical generalism.A direct input from the patient’s personal GP is necessary to make specialised care become more comprehensive and individualised.In reality, the team, practicing triage and task distribution, is increasingly replacing the doctor-patient relationship as working mode in primary careWhen the disease rather than the doctor-patient relationship, becomes the organising principle of primary care, medicine as a whole will be drained of the practice of its human dimension.
机译:>目的:从全科医学的角度研究医学的普遍状况。>论点:当全科医学的先驱者在持续的关系中学会了了解其患者时,便形成了全科医学通过各种医疗情况。从50年代开始,关于基于关系的一般实践的优点和挑战的文献越来越多,基于寄存器的研究表明了它的好处。通识教育的观点和以人为本的思想在专门的护理和医学教育中得以实现,但需要基于关系的通识教育的补充。从政治上定义初级保健的目的不是要平衡专业化的弊端,而是要在初级保健水平上提供药物。在瑞典,甚至在传统的全科医学据点中,基于团队的初级保健被认为可以应对日益增长的需求,通过分类进行非传染病和轻度疾病的筛选,实践任务分配以及将全科医生移至与>结论:当这种情况发生时,整个临床医学都将其人类层面的实践消耗drain尽。缺乏绝对的医疗福利证明无法证明无视相互关系和信任的价值,但是,在一些国家,基于关系的一般做法对于计划其职业生涯的全科医生而言将很难实现。如果政治风向发生变化,则可以在团队模型中维护全科医生的职业精神,以保持他们的关系风气,以准备改革初级保健。 style =“ clear:both”>关键要点 class =“无序“ style =” list-style-type:disc“> <!-list-behavior =无序前缀-word = mark-type = disc max-label-size = 0-> 宣告生物医学的广度和 要使专科护理变得更加全面和个性化,必须从患者的个人全科医生中直接输入信息。 li>实际上,分诊和任务分配的团队正在越来越多地取代医患关系作为基层医疗的工作模式 当疾病而非医患关系成为组织原则时在初级保健中,整个医学都将耗尽其人类层面的实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号