首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Pain Research >Postoperative analgesia after combined thoracoscopic–laparoscopic esophagectomy: a randomized comparison of continuous infusion and intermittent bolus thoracic epidural regimens
【2h】

Postoperative analgesia after combined thoracoscopic–laparoscopic esophagectomy: a randomized comparison of continuous infusion and intermittent bolus thoracic epidural regimens

机译:胸腔镜-腹腔镜食管切除术联合术后镇痛:连续输注和间歇推注胸腔硬膜外方案的随机比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PurposeJudicious postoperative pain management after thoracoscopic–laparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE) facilitates enhanced rehabilitation. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) offers many benefits in esophagectomy, while several complications are associated with the delivery mode by continuous epidural infusion. This study compared the efficiency and safety of intermittent epidural bolus to continuous epidural infusion for pain management after TLE.
机译:目的明智的胸腔镜-腹腔镜食管切除术(TLE)术后疼痛管理有助于加强康复。胸膜硬膜外镇痛(TEA)在食管切除术中提供了许多好处,而连续硬膜外输注的分娩方式与多种并发症有关。这项研究比较了间歇性硬膜外推注与连续硬膜外输注治疗TLE后疼痛的效率和安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号