首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience >Personality disorders at the interface of psychiatry and the law: legal use and clinical classification
【2h】

Personality disorders at the interface of psychiatry and the law: legal use and clinical classification

机译:精神病学和法律界的人格障碍:法律使用和临床分类

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Personality disorders have a complex relationship with the law that in many ways reflects their complexity within the clinical and research communities. This paper addresses expert testimony about personality disorders, outlines how personality disorders are assessed in forensic cases, and describes how personality disorders are viewed in different legal contexts. Reasons are identified why personality disorders are not generally accepted as significant mental illness within the legal system, including high incidence of personality dysfunction in criminal populations, frequent comorbidity of personality disorders making it difficult to determine direct causation, and difficulty determining where on a continuum personality traits should be defined as illness (or not). In summary, the legal system, to a significant degree, mirrors the clinical conception of personality disorders as not severe mental diseases or defects, not likely to change, and most often, under volitional control.
机译:人格障碍与法律有着复杂的关系,在许多方面都反映出其在临床和研究领域的复杂性。本文讨论了关于人格障碍的专家证词,概述了在法医案件中如何评估人格障碍,并描述了如何在不同的法律背景下看待人格障碍。确定了为什么人格障碍在法律体系内通常不被视为重大精神疾病的原因,包括犯罪人群中人格功能障碍的高发率,人格障碍的频繁合并症使得难以确定直接因果关系以及难以确定连续性人格在何处特质应定义为疾病(或非疾病)。总而言之,法律制度在很大程度上反映了人格障碍的临床概念,认为人格障碍不是严重的精神疾病或缺陷,不太可能改变,而且通常是在自愿控制下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号