首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>EFORT Open Reviews >State-of-the-art diagnosis and surgical treatment of acute peri-prosthetic joint infection following primary total hip arthroplasty
【2h】

State-of-the-art diagnosis and surgical treatment of acute peri-prosthetic joint infection following primary total hip arthroplasty

机译:全髋关节置换术后急性假体周围关节感染的最新诊断和外科治疗

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc" id="list1-2058-5241.3.170032">Acute peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a potentially devastating and undesired complication, with a prevalence of 0.3% to 2.9%. Its suspicion begins with a meticulous physical examination and anamnesis. Diagnosis should be made on the basis of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Serum and synovial biomarkers are very useful tools when major criteria are absent.Although sometimes not possible due to medical conditions, surgery is usually the first line of treatment. Although its outcome is highly correlated with the isolated microorganism, irrigation and debridement with implant retention (DAIR) is the gold standard for treatment. Ideally, the prior approach should be proximally and distally extended to augment the field of view and remove all of the prosthetic modular components, that is, femoral head and acetabular insert.Given DAIR’s unclear control of infection, with successful outcomes in the range of 30% to 95%, one- or two-stage revision protocols may play a role in certain cases of acute infections; nonetheless, further prospective, randomized studies are necessary to compare long-term outcomes between DAIR and revision surgeries.Following surgical treatment, length of antibiotherapy is in the range of six weeks to six months, without any difference in outcomes between short and long protocols. Treatment should be adjusted to the isolated bacteria and controlled further with post-operative serum biomarker levels.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:434-441. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170032
机译:class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type:disc” id =“ list1-2058-5241.3.170032”> <!-list-behavior = unordered prefix-word = mark-type = disc max- label-size = 0-> 全髋关节置换术(THA)后的急性假体周围关节感染(PJI)是一种潜在的破坏性疾病,其不良发生率为0.3%至2.9%。它的怀疑始于一丝不苟的身体检查和回忆。诊断应根据肌肉骨骼感染学会的标准进行。当没有主要标准时,血清和滑膜生物标志物是非常有用的工具。 尽管有时由于医疗条件而不可能,但手术通常是第一线的治疗方法。尽管其结果与分离的微生物高度相关,但保留植入物的冲洗和清创术(DAIR)是治疗的金标准。理想情况下,现有方法应向近端和远端扩展,以扩大视野并去除所有假体模块化组件,即股骨头和髋臼假体。 鉴于DAIR对感染的控制不清楚,一阶段或两阶段修订方案可能在某些急性感染病例中起作用,成功率在30%到95%之间;尽管如此,仍需要进一步的前瞻性随机研究来比较DAIR和翻修手术的长期结果。 在进行外科治疗后,抗生物治疗的时间范围为6周至6个月,两者之间无任何差异。短期和长期方案之间的结果。治疗应针对分离出的细菌进行调整,并通过术后血清生物标志物水平进一步控制。 引用本文:EFORT Open Rev 2018; 3:434-441。 DOI:10.1302 / 2058-5241.3.170032

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号