首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Endoscopy International Open >Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) vs. argon plasma coagulation (APC) for the management of gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) in patients with and without cirrhosis: results from a retrospective analysis of a large cohort of patients treated at a single center
【2h】

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) vs. argon plasma coagulation (APC) for the management of gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) in patients with and without cirrhosis: results from a retrospective analysis of a large cohort of patients treated at a single center

机译:射频消融(RFA)与氩气血浆凝固(APC)在有和没有肝硬化的患者中管理胃窦血管扩张(GAVE)的研究:回顾性分析在单个中心接受治疗的一大批患者的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction and study aims  Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is a mucosal abnormality associated with multiple conditions, most notably cirrhosis and systemic sclerosis, that causes indolent gastrointestinal bleeding. It is primarily managed with endoscopic therapy. Traditionally, GAVE is endoscopically ablated using argon plasma coagulation (APC) but radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is emerging as an alternative modality. No prior comparison of the 2 modalities has been published.
机译:引言和研究目的胃窦血管性扩张(GAVE)是一种与多种疾病相关的粘膜异常,最明显的是肝硬化和全身性硬化,会引起胃肠道惰性出血。它主要通过内窥镜治疗进行管理。传统上,使用氩等离子体凝集术(APC)在内窥镜下消融GAVE,但射频消融(RFA)逐渐成为一种替代方式。没有公开比较这两种方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号