首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Endoscopy International Open >Management of early gastric cancer with positive horizontal or indeterminable margins after endoscopic submucosal dissection: multicenter survey
【2h】

Management of early gastric cancer with positive horizontal or indeterminable margins after endoscopic submucosal dissection: multicenter survey

机译:内镜下黏膜下剥离术后边缘水平或不确定边缘阳性的早期胃癌的治疗:多中心调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background and study aims Positive horizontal margins in resected specimens are sometimes encountered after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancers, and appropriate treatment strategies for these cases are not established. The aim of this study was to evaluate current empirical treatments for patients with positive horizontal or indeterminable margins after ESD. >Patients and methods We performed a multicenter survey and data from 14 hospitals were collected. The pooled proportions of positive horizontal or indeterminable margins and those of patients followed up without early intervention were calculated using a logistic-normal random-effects model. For calculating pooled estimates, subgroup analyses of high- and non-high-volume centers were conducted. >Results A total of 11,796 ESD cases were enrolled and 229 patients (2 %) had positive horizontal or indeterminable margins. Ninety-eight cases were treated within 30 days of ESD and 131 cases were followed up without early treatments. Pooled estimates of positive margins in high- and non-high-volume centers were 1 % (95 % CI: 1 % – 2 %) and 2 % (95 % CI: 1 % – 4 %), respectively, and were not heterogeneous (P = 0.191). The proportion of patients followed up without early intervention ranged from 30 % to 100 %. The pooled estimate was 68 % (95 % CI: 50 % – 83 %). The pooled estimates of high- and non-high-volume centers were 65 % (95 % CI: 38 % – 85 %) and 72 % (95 % CI: 44 % – 89 %), respectively, and were not heterogeneous (P = 0.692). >Conclusion There was insufficient consensus regarding treatment strategies used for early gastric cancer with positive horizontal or indeterminable margins after ESD. Further studies are required to establish a consensus.
机译:>背景和研究目的对于早期胃癌,在内镜下黏膜下剥离术(ESD)后,切除标本有时会出现阳性水平切缘,并且尚未建立适当的治疗策略。这项研究的目的是评估ESD后水平或不确定边缘阳性的患者目前的经验疗法。 >患者和方法我们进行了一次多中心调查,并收集了14家医院的数据。使用逻辑对数随机效应模型计算阳性水平或不确定边缘的合并比例,以及未进行早期干预而随访的患者比例。为了计算合并的估计,对高容量和非高容量中心进行了子组分析。 >结果总共招募了11,796例ESD病例,其中229例(2 %%)的水平或不确定边缘阳性。在ESD的30天内对98例患者进行了治疗,对131例患者进行了随访,未进行早期治疗。高容量和非高容量中心的正边际合并估计分别为1%(95%CI:1 %% – 2%)和2%(95%CI:1 %% – 4%),并且不是异质的(P = 0.191)。在没有早期干预的情况下进行随访的患者比例在30%至100%之间。汇总估计为68%(95%CI:50%-83%)。高容量和非高容量中心的合并估计分别为65%(95%CI:38%–85%)和72%(95%CI:44%– 89%),并且不是异质的(P = 0.692)。 >结论对于早期胃癌在ESD后水平或不确定边缘阳性的治疗策略尚未达成共识。需要进一步研究以建立共识。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号