首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Endoscopy International Open >Diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. Results of a pilot randomized single-center study (with videos)
【2h】

Diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. Results of a pilot randomized single-center study (with videos)

机译:小型结肠直肠息肉切除术比较冷热圈套器和冷活检钳息肉切除术。一项试验性随机单中心研究的结果(带视频)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: The optimal method of diminutive polypectomy (< 6 mm) is unknown. >Objective: To assess the rates of incomplete resection of diminutive polyps of the colon using three standard polyp resection techniques (hot snare, cold snare, and cold biopsy forceps). >Design: Randomized, pilot study. >Settings: Single-center endoscopy center. >Patients: Patients undergoing routine outpatient colonoscopies. >Interventions: Polypectomy was performed using the method to which the patient was randomized. Following retrieval of the polyp, the polypectomy base was lifted by submucosal injection of normal saline and then excised using the cold snare device. If no tissue could be removed, then at least four cold biopsies using forceps of the remaining margin were obtained. >Main outcome measures: Adequacy of resection of diminutive polyps, which was defined as no visible adenoma or hyperplastic tissue seen in the base tissue on histology. >Results: A total of 60 patients were enrolled (57 % male), the mean age was 60 (range 33 – 82), and 62 polyps were randomized from 37 patients. The mean polyp size was 3.6 mm (range 2 – 5 mm) and 37 polyps (60 %) were adenomatous. Overall incomplete polyp resection rate was 9 % (95 %CI 3 – 19 %), 5 of 37 (14 %) for adenomas. By the study arm, the incomplete resection rates were 1 of 18 (6 %) for hot snare, 2 of 21 (10 %) for cold snare, and 2 of 18 (11 %) for cold biopsy forceps. The majority of polyp bases were removed with cold biopsy forceps since most of the endoscopists did not feel that the saline lift cold snare method was feasible or appropriate. >Limitations: Small sample size; endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of the polyp base tissue was not routinely performed. >Conclusions: Recruiting patients to a pilot study that randomized polyps to one of three common methods of polypectomy for diminutive polyps was feasible, and approximately 1 in 10 diminutive polyps found on colonoscopy were incompletely resected by standard polypectomy methods.
机译:>背景:小型息肉切除术(<6mm)的最佳方法尚不清楚。 >目的:使用三种标准的息肉切除技术(热圈套器,冷圈套器和冷活检钳)评估结肠不全息肉的不完全切除率。 >设计:随机化的初步研究。 >设置:单中心内窥镜中心。 >患者:接受常规门诊结肠镜检查的患者。 >干预措施:使用患者随机分配的方法进行切除手术。取出息肉后,通过粘膜下注射生理盐水将息肉切除术的基座提起,然后使用冷圈套器切除。如果无法去除组织,则使用剩余边缘的镊子进行至少四次冷活检。 >主要结局指标:切除微小息肉的充分性,定义为组织学基础组织中未见可见腺瘤或增生组织。 >结果:共有60例患者(男性占57%),平均年龄为60岁(33-82岁之间),并从37例患者中随机抽取了62例息肉。息肉平均大小为3.6 mm(范围为2 -5 mm),息肉为37例(60%)。息肉切除术的总不完全率为9 was%(95%CI 3 -19%),腺瘤37例中有5例(14(%)。通过研究组,热圈套术的不完全切除率为18分之一(6%),冷圈套术为21分(21%)(10%),冷活检钳为18分(2%)。由于大多数内镜医师并不认为盐水提拉冷圈套法是可行或适当的,因此用冷活检钳去除了大多数息肉基底。 >限制:样本量小;息肉基础组织的内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)并非常规手术。 >结论:招募患者进行一项初步研究,认为将息肉随机分配到三种常见的息肉切除术中以缩小息肉的方法中的一种是可行的,并且在结肠镜检查中发现的十分之一的缩小性息肉中,标准息肉切除术不能完全切除。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号