首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Endoscopy International Open >Comparison of long-term outcomes between endoscopic band ligation and endoscopic clipping for colonic diverticular hemorrhage
【2h】

Comparison of long-term outcomes between endoscopic band ligation and endoscopic clipping for colonic diverticular hemorrhage

机译:内镜带结扎与内镜钳夹治疗结肠憩室出血的远期疗效比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background and study aims: Long-term outcomes of endoscopic band ligation (EBL) for colonic diverticular hemorrhage have not been reported to date. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term outcomes of EBL and to retrospectively compare them with those of endoscopic clipping (EC) in the treatment of colonic diverticular hemorrhage. >Patients and methods: The study included patients with colonic diverticular hemorrhage who were treated with EBL or EC from January 2004 to November 2014 and followed up more than 1 year (61 patients in the EBL group and 39 patients in the EC group). Time-to-event analysis of rebleeding was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. A follow-up colonoscopy was performed to confirm the disappearance of the banded diverticula in the EBL group. >Results: Rebleeding occurred in 21 patients in the EBL group and in 26 patients in the EC group. The cumulative incidence of rebleeding at 1, 12, 24, and 36 months after first treatments was 14 %, 23 %, 26 %, and 41 % in the EBL group and 38 %, 49 %, 59 %, and 68 % in the EC group, respectively. Time-to-event analysis revealed statistically significant data (Log-rank test, P = 0.0036). Scar formation with fold convergence at the previously banded site was observed in 11 of 24 patients who underwent follow-up colonoscopy (46 %). However, late rebleeding (rebleeding more than 30 days after EBL) occurred in five of these 11 cases. >Conclusions: EBL was superior to EC in the treatment of colonic diverticular hemorrhage. However, the risk of rebleeding was not avoided even after the diverticula had been resolved using EBL.
机译:>背景和研究目的:迄今为止,尚无内镜带结扎术(EBL)治疗结肠憩室出血的长期结果。这项研究的目的是确定EBL的长期疗效,并将其与内镜夹钳(EC)进行回顾性比较,以治疗结肠憩室出血。 >患者和方法:该研究包括2004年1月至2014年11月接受EBL或EC治疗并随访超过1年的结肠憩室出血患者(EBL组61例,EBL组39例)。 EC组)。事件再分析的时间采用Kaplan-Meier方法进行。进行了结肠镜检查,以确认EBL组带状憩室的消失。 >结果:EBL组21例和EC组26例发生再出血。初次治疗后1、12、24和36个月再出血的累积发生率在EBL组中分别为14%,23%,26%和41%,在EBL组中分别为38%,49%,59%和68%。 EC组分别。事件发生时间分析显示具有统计学意义的数据(对数秩检验,P,= 0.0036)。在接受后续结肠镜检查的24例患者中,有11例观察到在先前带状部位的疤痕形成,并具有褶皱收敛(46 %%)。但是,这11例病例中有5例发生后期再出血(在EBL后超过30天再出血)。 >结论:在结肠憩室出血的治疗中,EBL优于EC。但是,即使使用EBL解决了憩室,也无法避免再出血的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号