首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Environmental Health Perspectives >Exploring bias in a generalized additive model for spatial air pollution data.
【2h】

Exploring bias in a generalized additive model for spatial air pollution data.

机译:在用于空间空气污染数据的广义加性模型中探索偏差。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

During the past few years, the generalized additive model (GAM) has become a standard tool for epidemiologic analysis exploring the effect of air pollution on population health. Recently, the use of the GAM has been extended from time-series data to spatial data. Still more recently, it has been suggested that the use of GAMs to analyze time-series data results in air pollution risk estimates being biased upward and that concurvity in the time-series data results in standard error estimates being biased downward. We show that concurvity in spatial data can lead to underestimation of the standard error of the estimated air pollution effect, even when using an asymptotically unbiased standard error estimator. We also show that both the magnitude and direction of the bias in the air pollution effect depend, at least in part, on the nature of the concurvity. We argue that including a nonparametric function of location in a GAM for spatial epidemiologic data can be expected to result in concurvity. As a result, we recommend caution in using the GAM to analyze this type of data.
机译:在过去的几年中,广义加性模型(GAM)已成为流行病学分析的标准工具,旨在探索空气污染对人口健康的影响。最近,GAM的使用已从时间序列数据扩展到空间数据。更最近,已经提出使用GAM来分析时间序列数据导致空气污染风险估计向上偏差,并且时间序列数据的一致性导致标准误差估计向下偏差。我们显示,即使使用渐近无偏的标准误差估计器,空间数据中的一致性也会导致对估计的空气污染效应的标准误差的低估。我们还表明,空气污染效应中偏差的大小和方向都至少部分取决于曲线的性质。我们认为,在GAM中包含针对空间流行病学数据的位置的非参数函数,可以预期导致弯曲。因此,我们建议在使用GAM分析此类数据时要谨慎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号