首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine >Cost-benefit analysis methods for assessing air pollution control programs in urban environments—A review
【2h】

Cost-benefit analysis methods for assessing air pollution control programs in urban environments—A review

机译:评估城市环境中空气污染控制计划的成本效益分析方法-综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The most common method of evaluating beneficial impacts of environmental policies is cost-benefit analysis (CBA). In the present review, CBA methods for air pollution impacts are reviewed. Three types of air pollution effects are identified, including health, productivity, and amenity. Market valuation, stated preference methods, and revealed preference methods are identified for valuing benefits. Three types of costs are deseribed, including private sector costs, societal costs, and governmental regulatory costs. A benefits valuation approach based on Freeman's principals is described. A costs valuation approach based on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Dixon et al. principals is deseribed. Limitations associated with estimates of benefits and costs are summarized. Input assumptions and results are compared for several existing air pollution control analyses. The importance of CBA in environmental policy studies is discussed. Our conceptual approaches should be useful in analyses of urban air pollution impacts and air pollution prevention policies.
机译:评估环境政策的有利影响的最常用方法是成本效益分析(CBA)。在当前的审查中,CBA方法对空气污染的影响进行了审查。确定了三种类型的空气污染影响,包括健康,生产力和舒适性。确定市场价值,陈述的优惠方法和公开的优惠方法以评估收益。分为三类成本,包括私营部门成本,社会成本和政府监管成本。描述了基于Freeman原理的福利评估方法。基于美国环境保护局和Dixon等人的成本评估方法。校长被取消。总结了与收益和成本估算有关的限制。对输入的假设和结果进行了比较,以进行几种现有的空气污染控制分析。讨论了CBA在环境政策研究中的重要性。我们的概念方法应有助于分析城市空气污染影响和空气污染预防政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号