首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Environmental Health Perspectives >Design options and methodological fallacies in the studies of reproductive failures.
【2h】

Design options and methodological fallacies in the studies of reproductive failures.

机译:研究生殖衰竭的设计选择和方法学上的谬误。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Reproductive failures are at first sight well suited for epidemiologic research. The time of pregnancy is closely monitored, and failures such as spontaneous abortions and subfecundity are rather frequent. Although epidemiologists' interest in the field has been growing, there is still disappointingly little new information of relevance for prevention. A number of methodologic shortcomings may explain this. A large part of disease classification is not well suited for etiologic research, reduced fertility has diminished the populations at risk, close medical monitoring tends to mask causal links, and many scientific problems related to this area bring limitations to the research field. Still, much more could be learned from a systematic use of epidemiologic knowledge, existing registers, and the joint effort between different research groups.
机译:生殖衰竭乍一看非常适合流行病学研究。怀孕时间受到严密监控,自然流产等失败率很高。尽管流行病学家对该领域的兴趣在增长,但令人失望的是,与预防相关的新信息仍然很少。许多方法上的缺陷可以解释这一点。疾病分类的很大一部分不适用于病因学研究,生育力下降已使处于危险中的人群减少,密切的医学监测往往掩盖了因果关系,与此领域相关的许多科学问题都给研究领域带来了局限。但是,通过流行病学知识的系统使用,现有的登记册以及不同研究小组之间的共同努力,可以学到更多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号