首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Mayo Clinic Proceedings >Outcomes of a System-Wide Protocol for Elective and Nonelective Coronary Angioplasty at Sites Without On-site Surgery: The Mayo Clinic Experience
【2h】

Outcomes of a System-Wide Protocol for Elective and Nonelective Coronary Angioplasty at Sites Without On-site Surgery: The Mayo Clinic Experience

机译:在没有现场手术的地点进行全系统选择性和非选择性冠状动脉血管成形术的结果:梅奥诊所的经验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) at 2 community hospitals without on-site surgery (Franciscan Skemp Healthcare and Immanuel St. Joseph's Hospital) with a center with on-site surgery (Saint Marys Hospital).PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a matched case-control design, we studied 1842 elective and 667 nonelective PCI procedures (myocardial infarction [MI]/cardiogenic shock) performed from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2007. The quality assurance protocol included operator volume and training, application of a risk-adjustment model, transport protocol, and database participation. We compared in-hospital mortality and/or emergent coronary artery bypass surgery after PCI at Franciscan Skemp Healthcare and Immanuel St. Joseph's Hospital, which do not have on-site surgery, with Saint Marys Hospital, a medical center with the capability to perform coronary artery bypass grafting on site.RESULTS: Of 22 baseline variables, significant imbalances between matched groups were present in only 3 (hyperlipidemia, history of MI, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association B2/C type lesion) in the elective group and 2 (Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III/IV angina, multivessel disease) in the nonelective group. The primary end point occurred in 0.3%, 0.1%, and 0.6% of patients undergoing elective PCI (P=.07) and 3.3%, 3.3%, and 3.7% of patients undergoing nonelective PCI (P=.65) at Immanuel St. Joseph's Hospital, Franciscan Skemp Healthcare, and Saint Marys Hospital, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate at Immanuel St. Joseph's Hospital and Franciscan Skemp Healthcare was comparable to that at Saint Marys Hospital for both elective (0.3%, 0.1%, 0.4%; P=.24) and nonelective PCI (2.6%, 2.4%, 3.1%; P=.49). No patient undergoing elective PCI required transfer for emergency cardiac surgery. Of the 21 transfers, 20 (95%) were in the setting of MI and cardiogenic shock or left main/3-vessel disease; 18 patients (86%) survived to discharge.CONCLUSION: Optimal outcomes with PCI have been observed at community hospitals without on-site cardiac surgical programs with application of a prospective, standardized quality assurance protocol.
机译:目的:比较两家没有现场手术的社区医院(Franciscan Skemp Healthcare和伊曼纽尔·圣约瑟夫医院)与一个有现场手术中心(圣玛丽医院)的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCIs)的结果。患者和方法:使用匹配的病例对照设计,我们研究了从1999年1月1日到2007年12月31日执行的1842次选择性和667次非选择性PCI程序(心肌梗塞[MI] /心源性休克)。质量保证协议包括操作员人数和培训,风险调整模型,运输协议和数据库参与的应用。我们比较了没有现场手术的Franciscan Skemp Healthcare和Immanuel St.Joseph's Hospital在PCI后的院内死亡率和/或急诊冠状动脉搭桥术与圣玛丽医院(Saint Marys Hospital)的医疗能力,后者可以进行冠状动脉手术结果:在22个基线变量中,选择性组中只有3个(高脂血症,MI病史,美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会B2 / C型病变)匹配组之间存在显着失衡。 (非心血管疾病组)(加拿大心血管学会III / IV级心绞痛,多支血管疾病)。主要终点发生在伊曼纽尔街的接受选择性PCI的患者中有0.3%,0.1%和0.6%(P = .07)和接受非选择性PCI的患者中有3.3%,3.3%和3.7%(P = .65)分别是约瑟夫医院,方济各斯克医疗公司和圣玛丽医院。伊马纽埃尔·圣约瑟夫医院和弗朗西斯坎·斯肯普医疗保健公司的住院死亡率与选修性PCI(0.3%,0.1%,0.4%; P = .24)和非选择性PCI(2.6%,2.4)均与圣玛丽医院相当。 %,3.1%; P = .49)。接受择期PCI的患者无需为紧急心脏手术而转移。在21例转移中,有20例(95%)是在心梗和心源性休克或左主/ 3血管疾病的情况下发生的;结论:18例患者(86%)可以出院。结论:在社区医院观察到PCI的最佳结局,没有采用现场,标准化的质量保证规程的现场心脏外科手术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号