首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal >Comparison of Outcomes of Operatively Treated BicondylarTibial Plateau Fractures by External Fixation and Internal Fixation
【2h】

Comparison of Outcomes of Operatively Treated BicondylarTibial Plateau Fractures by External Fixation and Internal Fixation

机译:手术治疗双icon的结果比较胫骨平台骨折的外固定和内固定

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AbstractThe outcome of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures treated with either external fixation (35 patients) or internal fixation (24 patients) was reviewed. Outcome measures included the Rasmussen score, clinical complications, development of osteoarthritis and the requirement for total knee replacement (TKR). Twenty-two (92%) anatomical reductions were achieved in the internal fixation group compared to 27 (77%) in the external fixation group. Infective complications were more common in the external fixation group (9 patients, 26%) due to pin tract infection. There were no deep infections in the internal fixation group. The mean Rasmussen score was not significantly different (mean score 32 in external fixation and 29 in internal fixation) between the two groups and the incidence of osteoarthritis was the same in both groups. Four patients in the external fixation group underwent a TKR compared to 5 patients in the internal fixation group. Bicondylar tibial plateau fractureshave similar outcomes following external or internalfixation.
机译:摘要回顾了外固定架(35例)或内固定架(24例)治疗的双con胫骨平台骨折的预后。结果指标包括拉斯穆森评分,临床并发症,骨关节炎的发展以及全膝关节置换术(TKR)的需求。内固定组的解剖减少为22(92%),而外固定组为27(77%)。由于针道感染,外固定组感染并发症较为普遍(9例,26%)。内固定组无深层感染。两组之间的平均拉斯穆森评分没有显着差异(外固定平均得分为32,内固定平均得分为29),两组的骨关节炎发生率均相同。外固定组的4例患者进行了TKR,而内固定组的5例患者进行了TKR。 icon双胫骨平台骨折在外部或内部之后具有相似的结果固定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号