首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Epidemiology and Infection >Assessing the sensitivity of STD surveillance in the Netherlands: an application of the capture--recapture method.
【2h】

Assessing the sensitivity of STD surveillance in the Netherlands: an application of the capture--recapture method.

机译:评估荷兰性病监测的敏感性:捕获-捕获方法的应用。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The capture-recapture method was used to estimate the sensitivity of case finding in two national STD surveillance systems: (1) STD registration at municipal health services (STD-MHS); (2) statutory notification by clinicians (NNS). To identify those cases common to both surveillance systems, cases from 1995 were compared using individual identifiers. Estimated sensitivities for syphilis were: STD-MHS 31% (95% CI: 27-35%), NNS 64% (56-71%); and for gonorrhoea: STD-MHS 15% (14-18%), NNS 22% (19-25%). The combined sensitivity of both systems was 76% for syphilis and 34% for gonorrhoea. Differences in the sensitivity of the systems were significant. The NNS was more sensitive than the STD-MHS, and the identification of cases was significantly more sensitive for syphilis than for gonorrhoea. A stratified analysis showed comparable results for the two sexes. Knowledge on the sensitivity of surveillance systems is useful for public health decisions and essential for international comparisons.
机译:捕获-捕获方法被用来估计在两个国家性病监测系统中发现病例的敏感性:(1)在市政卫生部门进行性病登记(STD-MHS); (2)临床医生的法定通知。为了确定两个监视系统共有的案例,使用个人标识符对1995年以来的案例进行了比较。估计的梅毒敏感性为:STD-MHS 31%(95%CI:27-35%),NNS 64%(56-71%);对于淋病:STD-MHS为15%(14-18%),NNS为22%(19-25%)。两种系统对梅毒的敏感性均为76%,对淋病的敏感性为34%。该系统的灵敏度差异很大。 NNS比STD-MHS更敏感,对梅毒的病例识别比对淋病更敏感。分层分析显示两个性别的结果可比。有关监视系统敏感性的知识对于公共卫生决策非常有用,对于国际比较也必不可少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号