首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>ESMO Open >Interventions to improve care coordination between primary healthcare and oncology care providers: a systematic review
【2h】

Interventions to improve care coordination between primary healthcare and oncology care providers: a systematic review

机译:干预措施以改善基础医疗保健和肿瘤护理提供者之间的护理协调性:系统综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Coordination of patient care between primary care and oncology care providers is vital to care quality and outcomes across the cancer continuum, yet it is known to be challenging. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate current or new models of care and/or interventions aimed at improving coordination between primary care and oncology care providers for patients with adult breast and/or colorectal cancer. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination were searched for existing English language studies published between January 2000 and 15 May 2015. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies were included if they evaluated a specific model/intervention that was designed to improve care coordination between primary care and oncology care providers, for any stage of the cancer continuum, for patients with adult breast and/or colorectal cancer. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Twenty-two studies (5 systematic reviews, 6 RCTs and 11 non-randomised studies) were included and varied with respect to the targeted phase of the cancer continuum, type of model or intervention tested, and outcome measures. The majority of studies showed no statistically significant changes in any patient, provider or system outcomes. Owing to conceptual and methodological limitations in this field, the review is unable to provide specific conclusions about the most effective or preferred model/intervention to improve care coordination. Imprecise results that lack generalisability and definitiveness provide limited evidence to base the development of future interventions and policies.Trial registration numberCRD42015025006.
机译:初级保健和肿瘤护理提供者之间患者护理的协调对于整个癌症连续性的护理质量和结果至关重要,但众所周知这具有挑战性。我们进行了系统的评估,以评估当前和新的护理和/或干预模式,以改善成人乳腺癌和/或结直肠癌患者的初级护理和肿瘤护理提供者之间的协调。搜索MEDLINE,EMBASE,CINAHL,Cochrane系统评价图书馆数据库以及评价和传播中心,以查找2000年1月至2015年5月15日之间发布的现有英语研究。系统评价,荟萃分析,随机对照试验(RCT)和如果非随机研究评估了特定模型/干预措施,旨在改善癌症连续体的任何阶段,成年乳腺癌和/或大肠癌患者的特定模式/干预措施,以改善初级护理和肿瘤护理提供者之间的护理协调,则包括非随机研究。两名审稿人提取了数据并评估了偏见风险。纳入了22项研究(5项系统评价,6项RCT和11项​​非随机研究),并且就癌症连续性的目标阶段,所测试的模型或干预措施的类型以及结局指标而言有所不同。大多数研究表明,任何患者,提供者或系统结局均无统计学上的显着变化。由于该领域在概念和方法上的局限性,该综述无法提供有关最有效或首选的模型/干预措施以改善护理协调的具体结论。缺乏一般性和确定性的不精确结果为有限的未来干预措施和政策的发展提供了有限的证据。注册号为CRD42015025006。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号