首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>MDM Policy Practice >Population Health and Cost-Effectiveness Implications of a Treat All Recommendation for HCV: A Review of the Model-Based Evidence
【2h】

Population Health and Cost-Effectiveness Implications of a Treat All Recommendation for HCV: A Review of the Model-Based Evidence

机译:全面治疗建议对HCV的人口健康和成本效益影响:基于模型的证据回顾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The World Health Organization HCV Guideline Development Group is considering a “treat all” recommendation for persons infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). We reviewed the model-based evidence of cost-effectiveness and population health impacts comparing expanded treatment policies to more limited treatment access policies, focusing primarily on evaluations of all-oral directly acting antivirals published after 2012. Searching PubMed, we identified 2,917 unique titles. Sequentially reviewing titles and abstracts identified 226 potentially relevant articles for full-text review. Sixty-nine articles met all inclusion criteria—42 cost-effectiveness analyses and 30 models of population-health impacts, with 3 articles presenting both types of analysis. Cost-effectiveness studies for many countries concluded that expanding treatment to people with mild liver fibrosis, who inject drugs (PWID), or who are incarcerated is generally cost-effective compared to more restrictive treatment access policies at country-specific prices. For certain patient subpopulations in some countries—for example, elderly individuals without fibrosis—treatment is only cost-effective at lower prices. A frequent limitation is the omission of benefits and consequences of HCV transmission (i.e., treatment as prevention; risks of reinfection), which may underestimate or overestimate the cost-effectiveness of a “treat all” policy. Epidemiologic modeling studies project that through a combination of prevention, aggressive screening and diagnosis, and prompt treatment for all fibrosis stages, it may be possible to virtually eliminate HCV in many countries. Studies show that if resources are not available to diagnose and treat all HCV-infected individuals, treatment prioritization may be needed, with alternative prioritization strategies resulting in tradeoffs between reducing mortality or reducing incidence. Notably, because most new HCV infections are among PWID in many settings, HCV elimination requires unrestricted treatment access combined with injection transmission disruption strategies. The model-based evidence suggests that a properly constructed strategy that substantially expands HCV treatment could achieve cost-effective improvements in population health in many countries.
机译:世界卫生组织HCV指南制定小组正在考虑对感染丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的人进行“全面治疗”建议。我们比较了基于模型的成本效益和人口健康影响的证据,将扩大的治疗政策与更有限的治疗访问政策进行了比较,主要侧重于对2012年后发布的全口服直接作用抗病毒药物的评估。在PubMed中,我们找到了2,917个独特的标题。按顺序审阅标题和摘要,确定了226篇可能相关的文章以进行全文审阅。有69篇文章符合所有纳入标准,包括42项成本效益分析和30种人口健康影响模型,其中3篇文章介绍了两种分析。对许多国家进行的成本效益研究得出的结论是,与按国家特定价格制定的限制性更严格的治疗政策相比,将治疗范围扩大至轻度肝纤维化,注射药物(PWID)或被监禁的人通常具有成本效益。对于某些国家的某些患者亚群(例如,没有纤维化的老年患者),治疗只有降低价格才具有成本效益。常见的局限性是忽略了HCV传播的益处和后果(即作为预防的治疗;再感染的风险),这可能会低估或高估“全民治疗”政策的成本效益。流行病学模型研究预测,通过将预防,积极筛查和诊断以及对所有纤维化阶段的及时治疗相结合,在许多国家中可能实际上消除了HCV。研究表明,如果没有足够的资源来诊断和治疗所有被HCV感染的个体,则可能需要对治疗进行优先排序,而其他优先排序策略会导致降低死亡率或降低发病率之间的权衡。值得注意的是,由于在许多情况下大多数新的HCV感染都属于PWID,因此消除HCV需要不受限制的治疗途径以及注射传播中断策略。基于模型的证据表明,在许多国家中,适当构建的策略可以大幅扩展HCV的治疗,可以实现成本效益上的人口健康改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号