首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>European Journal of Medical Research >Bioethics of life programs: Taking seriously moral pluralism in clinical settings
【2h】

Bioethics of life programs: Taking seriously moral pluralism in clinical settings

机译:生命计划的生命伦理学:在临床环境中认真对待道德多元化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundIn the more and more globalized world, the experience of moral pluralism (often related to, or based upon, religious pluralism) has become a common issue which ethical importance is undeniable. Potential conflicts between patients' and therapeutic teams' moral views and between moral beliefs of the particular member of this team are being resolved in the light of bioethical theories, among which principlism remains the mainstream approach to biomedical ethics. The question arises, however, whether this approach, in itself, as being strictly bound to the specific and distinct American philosophical tradition, is to be considered the tool for so called 'moral imperialism'. Also architectures of principlism, in particular by elaborating the concept of common morality, defend the applicability of their theory to the pluralistic settings, it should be emphasized that the idea that some norms and standards of moral character are shared by all morally serious people in every culture has attracted criticism both from empirical as well as theoretical backgrounds.
机译:背景技术在越来越全球化的世界中,道德多元主义的经验(通常与宗教多元主义有关或基于宗教多元主义)已成为一个普遍的问题,其伦理重要性是不可否认的。患者和治疗团队的道德观念之间以及该团队特定成员的道德信念之间的潜在冲突正在根据生物伦理学理论加以解决,其中,原则主义仍然是生物医学伦理学的主流方法。然而,问题在于,这种方法本身是否严格遵守美国独特而独特的哲学传统,是否被认为是所谓“道德帝国主义”的工具。同样,原则主义的体系结构,特别是通过阐述共同道德的概念,捍卫其理论在多元环境中的适用性,应当强调的是,道德规范的一些规范和标准在每个道德认真的人中都得到了共享。文化从经验和理论背景都引起了批评。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号