首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>European Spine Journal >Effect sizes of non-surgical treatments of non-specific low-back pain
【2h】

Effect sizes of non-surgical treatments of non-specific low-back pain

机译:非手术治疗非特异性下腰痛的效果大小

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Numerous randomized trials have been published investigating the effectiveness of treatments for non-specific low-back pain (LBP) either by trials comparing interventions with a no-treatment group or comparing different interventions. In trials comparing two interventions, often no differences are found and it raises questions about the basic benefit of each treatment. To estimate the effect sizes of treatments for non-specific LBP compared to no-treatment comparison groups, we searched for randomized controlled trials from systematic reviews of treatment of non-specific LBP in the latest issue of the Cochrane Library, issue 2, 2005 and available databases until December 2005. Extracted data were effect sizes estimated as Standardized Mean Differences (SMD) and Relative Risk (RR) or data enabling calculation of effect sizes. For acute LBP, the effect size of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and manipulation were only modest (ES: 0.51 and 0.40, respectively) and there was no effect of exercise (ES: 0.07). For chronic LBP, acupuncture, behavioral therapy, exercise therapy, and NSAIDs had the largest effect sizes (SMD: 0.61, 0.57, and 0.52, and RR: 0.61, respectively), all with only a modest effect. Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation and manipulation had small effect sizes (SMD: 0.22 and 0.35, respectively). As a conclusion, the effect of treatments for LBP is only small to moderate. Therefore, there is a dire need for developing more effective interventions.
机译:通过比较干预组与非治疗组或比较不同干预组的试验,已发表了许多随机试验,以研究非特异性下腰痛(LBP)的治疗效果。在比较两种干预措施的试验中,通常没有发现差异,这引发了有关每种疗法基本益处的疑问。为了评估与非治疗组相比非特异性LBP的治疗效果大小,我们从Cochrane图书馆的最新一期(2005年第2期)中对非特异性LBP的治疗进行系统评价,寻找随机对照试验。直到2005年12月为止都没有可用的数据库。提取的数据是估计为标准均值差(SMD)和相对风险(RR)的效应量,或者是能够计算效应量的数据。对于急性LBP,非甾体类抗炎药(NSAID)的作用大小和操作仅适度(分别为ES:0.51和0.40),没有运动效果(ES:0.07)。对于慢性LBP,针灸,行为疗法,运动疗法和NSAIDs的影响最大(分别为SMD:0.61、0.57和0.52,RR:0.61),而效果均不明显。经皮电神经刺激和操纵的影响较小(SMD:分别为0.22和0.35)。结论是,LBP治疗的效果很小或中等。因此,迫切需要开发更有效的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号