首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>EXCLI Journal >Toxicological risk at workplace and toxicity as Life Cycle Assessment impact category: Substitution of solvents as an example
【2h】

Toxicological risk at workplace and toxicity as Life Cycle Assessment impact category: Substitution of solvents as an example

机译:工作场所的毒理学风险和毒性作为生命周期评估影响类别:以溶剂替代为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Substitution of hazardous substances against less hazardous ones is a central requirement of the European Chemical Regulation REACH (European Regulation 1907/2006/EC). Hazardous substances emitted from products may not only affect the worker; drift off and distribution in the environment may finally result in exposure of the general population. This potential threat to health is covered by the impact category “toxicity” in Life Cycle Assessments. In this paper, we present a case of a substitution of volatile organic compounds in a reactive varnish, and compare the “old” formulation with the “new” formulation against health risk to the worker, and concerning the Life Cycle Assessment impact category “toxicity”. The “old” formulation contained Naphtha (petroleum), hydrodesulfurized, heavy and Solvent naphtha (petroleum), light, aromatic. In the new formulation, both naphthas were replaced by n-Butylacetate, 1-Ethoxy-2-propyl acetate and Ethyl-3-ethoxy propionate. In the European Union, the naphthas are classified as mutagens and carcinogens category 1, officially. However, if benzene is below 0.1 %, registrants in the EU proposed to omit this classification, and todays naptha products on the market obviously have benzene contents below 0.1 %. On a first glance, the improvement for workplace safety introduced by the substitution, therefore, is comparatively small, as it is for toxicity in Life Cycle Assessment. However, when background knowledge concerning chemical production processes of naphtha is included, benzene below a content of 0.1 % needs to be taken into consideration, and the benefit of substitution is more obvious.
机译:用危险物质替代危害较小的物质是欧洲化学法规REACH(欧洲法规1907/2006 / EC)的核心要求。产品排放的有害物质不仅会影响工人,还会影响工人的健康。漂流,环境中的分布最终可能导致普通人群暴露。生命周期评估中的影响类别“毒性”涵盖了对健康的潜在威胁。在本文中,我们介绍了一种在反应性清漆中替代挥发性有机化合物的案例,并将“旧”配方与“新”配方对工人的健康风险进行了比较,并涉及了生命周期评估影响类别“毒性” ”。 “旧”配方包含加氢脱硫的重质石脑油(石油)和轻质芳香族的溶剂石脑油(石油)。在新配方中,两种石脑油均被乙酸正丁酯,乙酸1-乙氧基-2-丙酯和丙酸-3-乙氧基乙酯取代。在欧盟,石脑油被正式归为诱变剂和致癌物类别1。但是,如果苯含量低于0.1%,则欧盟的注册人建议忽略该分类,而当今市场上的石脑油产品显然苯含量低于0.1%。乍一看,因此,替代所带来的工作场所安全性改进相对较小,因为生命周期评估中的毒性改进相对较小。然而,当包括有关石脑油化学生产过程的背景知识时,需要考虑苯含量低于0.1%的苯,并且取代的好处更加明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号