首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM >Is Skin-Touch Sham Needle Not Placebo? A Double-Blind Crossover Study on Pain Alleviation
【2h】

Is Skin-Touch Sham Needle Not Placebo? A Double-Blind Crossover Study on Pain Alleviation

机译:Skin-Touch假针不是安慰剂吗?缓解疼痛的双盲交叉研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It remains an open question whether placebo/sham acupuncture, in which the needle tip presses the skin, can be used as a placebo device for research on pain. We compare the analgesic effect of the skin-touch placebo needle with that of the no-touch placebo needle, in which the needle tip does not touch the skin, in a double-blind crossover manner including no-treatment control in 23 healthy volunteers. The subjects received painful electrical stimulation in the forearm before and during needle retention to the LI 4 acupoint and after the removal of the needle and rated pain intensity using a visual analogue scale. We found no significant difference in analgesic effects among the skin-touch placebo needle, no-touch placebo needle, and no-treatment control at every point before, during, and after the treatments (p > 0.05). The results indicate that the skin-touch placebo needle can be used as a placebo device in clinical studies on pain.
机译:针尖压在皮肤上的安慰剂/假针灸能否用作研究疼痛的安慰剂仍是一个悬而未决的问题。我们在23名健康志愿者中以双盲交叉方式比较了皮肤接触型安慰剂针与无接触安慰剂针的镇痛效果,其中针尖不接触皮肤,包括无治疗对照。受试者在将针保持到LI 4穴位之前和期间以及拔出针头后使用视觉模拟量表对疼痛进行了电刺激,并评估了疼痛强度。我们发现在皮肤接触安慰剂针,非接触安慰剂针和未治疗对照之间的镇痛效果在治疗之前,期间和之后的每个点都没有显着差异(p> 0.05)。结果表明,皮肤接触型安慰剂针可用作疼痛临床研究中的安慰剂装置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号