首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Experimental Biology and Medicine >The inadequacy of the reductionist approach in discovering new therapeutic agents against complex diseases
【2h】

The inadequacy of the reductionist approach in discovering new therapeutic agents against complex diseases

机译:还原论方法不足以发现针对复杂疾病的新治疗剂

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

For more than 20 years, drug discovery has relied on two assumptions, i.e. (i) a therapeutic response can be triggered by modulating the activity of a single gene product, and (ii) a compound uncovered by its activity on a recombinant protein in vitro can perform its activity in vivo. Drug discovery operates accordingly by using the concepts of targets and pipelines. The target, such as a gene product, is the intended point of therapeutic intervention, and compounds that modulate its activity in vitro follow a series of downstream developments. This reductionist approach has developed due to advances in combinatorial chemistry, robotics, molecular biology, and genomics. The expectation of this approach is that the frequency of drug discovery will dramatically increase, while its associated cost would decrease. However, the frequency of new drug discovery has decreased, while the associated costs have surged. We performed a retrospective study that examined how successful development programs have led to marketed drugs for all indications except anti-infective and anti-neoplastic agents. We concluded that the target and pipeline paradigms are limited and are actually causing the drug development industry to collectively fail to meet the critical medical needs.Impact statementThe initial scope of this investigation was to build the set of human genes that are presumed to be the therapeutic intervention points of US FDA-approved drugs, in all therapeutics areas but oncology. The prerequisite for this study was the establishment of the non-redundant set of all active pharmaceutical ingredients for these disease areas. Pertaining to complex diseases, the main observation was that there is not a single instance in the history of drug discovery, where a compound, initially selected by means of a biochemical assay, achieved a significant therapeutic response. The whole field of Drug R&D faces an unacceptable lack of new treatments to address unmet medical needs. The conclusion is that complex biological assays have to be designed for the primary selection of candidate therapeutics.
机译:20多年来,药物开发一直依靠两个假设,即(i)可以通过调节单个基因产物的活性来触发治疗反应,以及(ii)在体外对重组蛋白的活性未被发现的化合物可以在体内发挥作用。药物发现通过使用靶标和管线的概念进行相应的操作。靶标(例如基因产物)是治疗干预的预期目标,在体外调节其活性的化合物遵循一系列下游发展。由于组合化学,机器人技术,分子生物学和基因组学的进步,这种还原论方法得到了发展。这种方法的期望是药物发现的频率将大大增加,而其相关的成本将降低。但是,新药发现的频率降低了,而相关的成本却飙升了。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,研究了成功的开发计划如何导致除抗感染药和抗肿瘤药以外的所有适应症的上市药物。我们得出的结论是,目标和研究范式有限,实际上导致药物开发行业集体无法满足关键的医学需求。影响陈述本研究的最初范围是构建被认为具有治疗作用的人类基因集。在除肿瘤学之外的所有治疗领域中,美国FDA批准的药物的干预点。这项研究的前提是要为这些疾病领域建立所有活性药物成分的非冗余组。关于复杂疾病,主要观察结果是在药物发现历史中没有一个实例,其中最初通过生化分析选择的化合物达到了显着的治疗反应。药物研发的整个领域都面临着无法接受的新疗法来满足未满足的医疗需求的问题。结论是必须为候选治疗剂的主要选择设计复杂的生物学检测方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号