首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Eye >A systematic review to assess the ‘treat-and-extend’ dosing regimen for neovascular age-related macular degeneration using ranibizumab
【2h】

A systematic review to assess the ‘treat-and-extend’ dosing regimen for neovascular age-related macular degeneration using ranibizumab

机译:进行系统评价以评估使用兰尼单抗治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的治疗-扩展给药方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in the developed world. Monthly or as-needed (PRN) dosing strategies of intravitreal ranibizumab have been established as efficacious treatment options for neovascular AMD. More recently, the ‘treat-and-extend’ dosing regimen (TREX) is being adopted in clinical practice as it represents a patient-centric and economical option, reducing treatment burden by extending injection intervals when possible. However, the efficacy of TREX using ranibizumab monotherapy remains to be defined. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to assess the current evidence for TREX using ranibizumab by searching MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed. Of the 1733 articles identified, nine TREX studies were included in our analysis (n=748 eyes). Average patient age was 79.25 (range: 77.34–82.00; SD: 7.27). Baseline BCVA ranged from 48.5–68.9 ETDRS letters. BCVA improvement was 8.92 letters at 1 year (range: 6.5–11.5; SD: 7.54), as a weighted mean accounting for numbers of study eyes. The weighted mean number of injections at one year was 8.60 (range: 7.3–12.0; SD: 1.73). Previously, the landmark ANCHOR and MARINA trials reported gains of 11.3 and 7.2 letters, respectively, using monthly ranibizumab. Chin-Yee et al reported a gain of 3.5 ETDRS letters with 5.3 (S.D. 0.66) PRN ranibizumab injections as weighted means at 1 year in their recent systematic review. Our analysis suggests that TREX delivers visual outcomes superior to PRN and approaches similar efficacy to monthly injections. Further RCTs are needed to fully evaluate the efficacy and economy of TREX in the long-term.
机译:与年龄有关的黄斑变性(AMD)是发达国家不可逆性失明的主要原因。玻璃体内兰尼单抗的按月或按需(PRN)给药策略已被确定为新血管AMD的有效治疗选择。最近,“治疗扩展”给药方案(TREX)在临床实践中被采用,因为它代表了以患者为中心且经济的选择,并通过尽可能延长注射间隔来减轻治疗负担。但是,使用雷珠单抗单药治疗的TREX疗效仍有待确定。因此,我们通过搜索MEDLINE,Embase和PubMed对兰尼单抗进行了系统评价,以评估TREX的当前证据。在确定的1733篇文章中,有9篇TREX研究纳入了我们的分析(n = 748眼)。患者平均年龄为79.25(范围:77.34–82.00;标准差:7.27)。基线BCVA在ETDRS字母范围内,为48.5–68.9。 1年时BCVA改善为8.92个字母(范围:6.5-11.5; SD:7.54),作为加权平均数,占研究眼睛的数量。一年的加权平均注射次数为8.60(范围:7.3-12.0;标准差:1.73)。以前,具有里程碑意义的ANCHOR和MARINA试验报告使用每月兰尼单抗的治疗分别增加了11.3和7.2个字母。在最近的系统评价中,Chin-Yee等人报告在1年时使用5.3(S.D. 0.66)PRN兰尼单抗注射作为加权均数可获得3.5个ETDRS字母。我们的分析表明,TREX的视觉效果优于PRN,并且功效与每月注射相似。需要更多的RCT来长期全面评估TREX的功效和经济性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号