首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience >Classification of Visual and Non-visual Learners Using Electroencephalographic Alpha and Gamma Activities
【2h】

Classification of Visual and Non-visual Learners Using Electroencephalographic Alpha and Gamma Activities

机译:使用脑电图Alpha和Gamma活动对视觉和非视觉学习者进行分类

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study analyzes the learning styles of subjects based on their electroencephalo-graphy (EEG) signals. The goal is to identify how the EEG features of a visual learner differ from those of a non-visual learner. The idea is to measure the students’ EEGs during the resting states (eyes open and eyes closed conditions) and when performing learning tasks. For this purpose, 34 healthy subjects are recruited. The subjects have no background knowledge of the animated learning content. The subjects are shown the animated learning content in a video format. The experiment consists of two sessions and each session comprises two parts: (1) Learning task: the subjects are shown the animated learning content for an 8–10 min duration. (2) Memory retrieval task The EEG signals are measured during the leaning task and memory retrieval task in two sessions. The retention time for the first session was 30 min, and 2 months for the second session. The analysis is performed for the EEG measured during the memory retrieval tasks. The study characterizes and differentiates the visual learners from the non-visual learners considering the extracted EEG features, such as the power spectral density (PSD), power spectral entropy (PSE), and discrete wavelet transform (DWT). The PSD and DWT features are analyzed. The EEG PSD and DWT features are computed for the recorded EEG in the alpha and gamma frequency bands over 128 scalp sites. The alpha and gamma frequency band for frontal, occipital, and parietal regions are analyzed as these regions are activated during learning. The extracted PSD and DWT features are then reduced to 8 and 15 optimum features using principal component analysis (PCA). The optimum features are then used as an input to the k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) classifier using the Mahalanobis distance metric, with 10-fold cross validation and support vector machine (SVM) classifier using linear kernel, with 10-fold cross validation. The classification results showed 97% and 94% accuracies rate for the first session and 96% and 93% accuracies for the second session in the alpha and gamma bands for the visual learners and non-visual learners, respectively, for k-NN classifier for PSD features and 68% and 100% accuracies rate for first session and 100% accuracies rate for second session for DWT features using k-NN classifier for the second session in the alpha and gamma band. For PSD features 97% and 96% accuracies rate for the first session, 100% and 95% accuracies rate for second session using SVM classifier and 79% and 82% accuracy for first session and 56% and 74% accuracy for second session for DWT features using SVM classifier. The results showed that the PSDs in the alpha and gamma bands represent distinct and stable EEG signatures for visual learners and non-visual learners during the retrieval of the learned contents.
机译:这项研究基于他们的脑电图(EEG)信号分析了受试者的学习方式。目的是确定视觉学习者的脑电特征与非视觉学习者的脑电特征有何不同。这个想法是在休息状态(睁眼和闭眼)和执行学习任务时测量学生的脑电图。为此,招募了34名健康受试者。受试者没有动画学习内容的背景知识。将以视频格式向主题显示动画学习内容。实验分为两个部分,每个部分包括两个部分:(1)学习任务:向对象显示8-10分钟的动画学习内容。 (2)记忆检索任务脑电信号在学习任务和记忆检索任务期间分两个阶段进行测量。第一节的保留时间为30分钟,第二节的保留时间为2个月。对在内存检索任务期间测得的脑电图进行分析。这项研究根据提取的脑电图特征(例如功率谱密度(PSD),功率谱熵(PSE)和离散小波变换(DWT))将视觉学习者与非视觉学习者进行了区分和区分。分析了PSD和DWT功能。针对在128个头皮部位的alpha和gamma频带中记录的EEG计算EEG PSD和DWT特征。在学习过程中激活这些区域时,会分析额叶,枕叶和顶叶区域的alpha和gamma频段。然后使用主成分分析(PCA)将提取的PSD和DWT特征缩减为8和15个最佳特征。然后将最佳特征用作使用Mahalanobis距离度量,具有10倍交叉验证的支持向量机(SVM)分类器和具有10倍交叉交叉的支持向量机(SVM)分类器的输入,作为使用kal-最近邻居(k-NN)分类器的输入验证。分类结果显示,对于k-NN分类器,视觉学习者和非视觉学习者在alpha和γ波段中,第一节的准确率分别为97%和94%,第二节的准确率分别为96%和93%。使用k-NN分类器在alpha和gamma频段的第二次会话中,DWT功能的PSD特征以及第一会话的68%和100%准确率以及第二会话的100%准确率。对于PSD功能,使用SVM分类器,第一届会议的准确率达到97%和96%,第二届会议的准确率达到100%和95%,DWT第一届会议的准确性达到79%和82%,第二届会议的准确性达到56%和74%使用SVM分类器的功能。结果表明,在学习内容的检索过程中,alpha和gamma波段中的PSD代表了视觉学习者和非视觉学习者的独特而稳定的EEG签名。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号