首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Event Related Potentials Reveal Early Phonological and Orthographic Processing of Single Letters in Letter-Detection and Letter-Rhyme Paradigms
【2h】

Event Related Potentials Reveal Early Phonological and Orthographic Processing of Single Letters in Letter-Detection and Letter-Rhyme Paradigms

机译:事件相关电位揭示了字母检测和字母押韵范式中单个字母的早期语音和正字法处理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction: When and where phonological processing occurs in the brain is still under some debate. Most paired-rhyme and phonological priming studies used word stimuli, which involve complex neural networks for word recognition and semantics. This study investigates early (<300 ms) and late (>300 ms) orthographic and phonological processing of letters.>Methods: Fifteen participants aged 20–35 engaged in three two-forced choice experiments, one letter-detection (LetterID) and two letter-rhyme (Paired-Rhyme and Letter-Rhyme) tasks. From the EEG recordings, event related potential (ERP) differences within and across task stimuli were found. We also calculated the global field power (GFP) for each participant. Accuracies and reaction times were also measured from their button presses for each task.>Results: Behavioral: Reaction times were 18 ms faster to letter than pseudoletter stimuli, and 27 ms faster to rhyme than nonrhyme stimuli. ERP/GFP: In the LetterID task, grand-mean evoked potentials (EPs) showed typical P1, N1, P2, and P3 waveform morphologies to letter and pseudoletter stimuli, with GFPs to pseudoletters being greater than letters from 160–600 ms. Across both rhyme tasks, there were greater negativities for nonrhyme than for rhyme stimuli at 145 ms and 426 ms. The P2 effect for rhyme stimuli was smaller than letter stimuli when compared across tasks.>Conclusion: Differences in early processing of letters vs. pseudoletters between 130–190 ms suggest that letters are processed earlier and perhaps faster in the brain than pseudoletters. The P2 effect between letter and rhyme stimuli likely reflect sublexical phonological processing. Together, findings from our study fill in evidence for the temporal dynamics of orthographic and phonological processing of single letters.
机译:>简介:大脑中语音处理发生的时间和地点仍在争论中。多数韵韵和语音启动对研究都使用单词刺激,这涉及到复杂的神经网络来进行单词识别和语义识别。这项研究调查了字母的字法和语音处理的早期(<300 ms)和晚期(> 300 ms)。>方法:15名年龄在20-35岁之间的参与者参加了三个两次强制选择实验,一个字母-检测(LetterID)和两个字母押韵(Paired-Rhyme和Letter-Rhyme)任务。从脑电图记录中,发现任务刺激内和任务刺激之间的事件相关电位(ERP)差异。我们还计算了每个参与者的全球场强(GFP)。 >结果:行为:与假字母刺激相比,字母的反应时间要快18 ms,对韵律的响应时间比非韵律刺激要快27 ms。 ERP / GFP:在LetterID任务中,均值诱发电位(EP)对字母和伪字母刺激显示典型的P1,N1,P2和P3波形形态,对伪字母的GFP大于160-600 ms之间的字母。在这两个韵律任务中,在145 ms和426 ms时,非韵律的负性要大于韵律刺激的负性。在各个任务之间进行比较时,韵律刺激的P2效应小于字母刺激。>结论:130-190毫秒之间字母和伪字母的早期处理差异表明,字母处理较早,在字母中可能更快。脑比假字母。字母和韵律刺激之间的P2效应可能反映了词法语音处理。总之,我们的研究结果为单个字母的拼字和音位处理的时间动态提供了证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号