首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Genetics >Stratified randomization controls better for batch effects in 450K methylation analysis: a cautionary tale
【2h】

Stratified randomization controls better for batch effects in 450K methylation analysis: a cautionary tale

机译:分层随机对照可更好地控制450K甲基化分析中的批次效应:一个警示故事

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Batch effects in DNA methylation microarray experiments can lead to spurious results if not properly handled during the plating of samples.>Methods: Two pilot studies examining the association of DNA methylation patterns across the genome with obesity in Samoan men were investigated for chip- and row-specific batch effects. For each study, the DNA of 46 obese men and 46 lean men were assayed using Illumina's Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip. In the first study (Sample One), samples from obese and lean subjects were examined on separate chips. In the second study (Sample Two), the samples were balanced on the chips by lean/obese status, age group, and census region. We used methylumi, watermelon, and limma R packages, as well as ComBat, to analyze the data. Principal component analysis and linear regression were, respectively, employed to identify the top principal components and to test for their association with the batches and lean/obese status. To identify differentially methylated positions (DMPs) between obese and lean males at each locus, we used a moderated t-test.>Results: Chip effects were effectively removed from Sample Two but not Sample One. In addition, dramatic differences were observed between the two sets of DMP results. After “removing” batch effects with ComBat, Sample One had 94,191 probes differentially methylated at a q-value threshold of 0.05 while Sample Two had zero differentially methylated probes. The disparate results from Sample One and Sample Two likely arise due to the confounding of lean/obese status with chip and row batch effects.>Conclusion: Even the best possible statistical adjustments for batch effects may not completely remove them. Proper study design is vital for guarding against spurious findings due to such effects.
机译:>背景: DNA甲基化微阵列实验中的批处理结果,如果在样品铺板过程中处理不当,可能导致虚假结果。>方法:两项旨在检验DNA甲基化模式关联的试点研究在萨摩亚男性肥胖症的基因组中,针对芯片和行特异性批次效应进行了研究。对于每项研究,使用Illumina的Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip检测46名肥胖男性和46名瘦男性的DNA。在第一个研究中(样本一),在单独的芯片上检查了肥胖者和瘦者的样本。在第二项研究中(样本2),通过瘦/肥胖状态,年龄组和人口普查区域对样本进行平衡。我们使用了甲基米,西瓜和limma R包装以及ComBat来分析数据。主成分分析和线性回归分别用于确定主要的主成分,并测试它们与批次和瘦肉/肥胖状态的关系。为了确定每个地点的肥胖男性和瘦男性之间的差异甲基化位置(DMP),我们使用了中度t检验。>结果:有效地从样品2中除去了芯片效应,但没有从样品1中除去。此外,在两组DMP结果之间观察到了巨大差异。用ComBat“消除”批次效应后,样品一在94的q值阈值下具有94,191个差异甲基化的探针,而样品二具有零甲基化探针。样品一和样品二的结果可能完全不同,这是由于精益/肥胖状态与芯片和行批次效应的混杂所致。>结论:即使是针对批次效应的最佳统计调整,也可能无法完全消除它们。适当的研究设计对于防止因此类影响而导致的虚假发现至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号