首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Genetics >Gene-based multiple regression association testing for combined examination of common and low frequency variants in quantitative trait analysis
【2h】

Gene-based multiple regression association testing for combined examination of common and low frequency variants in quantitative trait analysis

机译:基于基因的多元回归关联测试用于定量性状分析中常见和低频变异的组合检查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Multi-marker methods for genetic association analysis can be performed for common and low frequency SNPs to improve power. Regression models are an intuitive way to formulate multi-marker tests. In previous studies we evaluated regression-based multi-marker tests for common SNPs, and through identification of bins consisting of correlated SNPs, developed a multi-bin linear combination (MLC) test that is a compromise between a 1 df linear combination test and a multi-df global test. Bins of SNPs in high linkage disequilibrium (LD) are identified, and a linear combination of individual SNP statistics is constructed within each bin. Then association with the phenotype is represented by an overall statistic with df as many or few as the number of bins. In this report we evaluate multi-marker tests for SNPs that occur at low frequencies. There are many linear and quadratic multi-marker tests that are suitable for common or low frequency variant analysis. We compared the performance of the MLC tests with various linear and quadratic statistics in joint or marginal regressions. For these comparisons, we performed a simulation study of genotypes and quantitative traits for 85 genes with many low frequency SNPs based on HapMap Phase III. We compared the tests using (1) set of all SNPs in a gene, (2) set of common SNPs in a gene (MAF ≥ 5%), (3) set of low frequency SNPs (1% ≤ MAF < 5%). For different trait models based on low frequency causal SNPs, we found that combined analysis using all SNPs including common and low frequency SNPs is a good and robust choice whereas using common SNPs alone or low frequency SNP alone can lose power. MLC tests performed well in combined analysis except where two low frequency causal SNPs with opposing effects are positively correlated. Overall, across different sets of analysis, the joint regression Wald test showed consistently good performance whereas other statistics including the ones based on marginal regression had lower power for some situations.
机译:可以对常见和低频SNP执行多标记方法进行遗传关联分析,以提高功效。回归模型是制定多标记测试的直观方法。在先前的研究中,我们评估了常见SNP的基于回归的多标记测试,并通过鉴定由相关SNP组成的区间,开发了一种多区间线性组合(MLC)测试,该测试是1 df线性组合测试与多df全局测试。识别高连锁不平衡(LD)中SNP的单元格,并在每个单元格内构建单个SNP统计信息的线性组合。然后,与表型的关联由df等于箱数的总统计量来表示。在本报告中,我们评估了发生在低频的SNP的多标记测试。有许多线性和二次多标记测试适用于常见或低频变异分析。我们在联合或边际回归中将MLC测试的性能与各种线性和二次统计进行了比较。为了进行这些比较,我们基于HapMap阶段III对85个具有许多低频SNP的基因的基因型和定量性状进行了模拟研究。我们比较了使用(1)基因中所有SNP的集合,(2)基因(MAF≥5%)的一组常见SNP,(3)低频SNP(1%≤MAF <5%)的测试的比较。对于基于低频因果SNP的不同性状模型,我们发现使用所有SNP(包括普通SNP和低频SNP)进行组合分析是一个不错且稳健的选择,而单独使用普通SNP或仅使用低频SNP可能会损失功率。 MLC测试在组合分析中表现良好,除了两个具有相反影响的低频因果SNP正相关。总体而言,在不同的分析集之间,联合回归Wald检验始终显示出良好的性能,而在某些情况下,包括基于边际回归的统计在内的其他统计数据的功效较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号