首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience >Using the Chinese version of Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale to describe postoperative delirium after hip surgery
【2h】

Using the Chinese version of Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale to describe postoperative delirium after hip surgery

机译:使用中文版纪念Deli妄评估量表描述髋关节手术后operative妄

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) assesses severity of delirium. However, whether the MDAS can be used in a Chinese population is unknown. Moreover, the optimal postoperative MDAS cutoff point for describing postoperative delirium in Chinese remains largely to be determined. We therefore performed a pilot study to validate MDAS in the Chinese language and to determine the optimal postoperative MDAS cutoff point for delirium.>Methods: Eighty-two patients (80 ± 6 years, 21.9% male), who had hip surgery under general anesthesia, were enrolled. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were administered to the patients before surgery. The CAM and MDAS were performed on the patients on the first, second and fourth postoperative days. The reliability and validity of the MDAS were determined. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal Chinese version MDAS cutoff point for the identification of delirium.>Results: The Chinese version of the MDAS had satisfactory internal consistency (α = 0.910). ROC analysis obtained an average optimal MDAS cutoff point of 7.5 in describing the CAM-defined postoperative delirium, with an area under the ROC of 0.990 (95% CI 0.977–1.000, P < 0.001).>Conclusions: The Chinese version of the MDAS had good reliability and validity. The patients whose postoperative Chinese version MDAS cutoff point score was 7.5 would likely have postoperative delirium. These results have established a system for a larger scale study in the future.
机译:>客观:纪念Deli妄评估量表(MDAS)评估of妄的严重程度。但是,MDAS是否可以在中国人口中使用尚不清楚。此外,描述中国人术后del妄的最佳术后MDAS截止点仍有待确定。因此,我们进行了一项初步研究,以中文验证MDAS并确定ir妄的最佳术后MDAS临界点。>方法:82例患者(80±6岁,男性21.9%)在全麻下进行了髋关节手术,被纳入研究。术前对患者进行了混乱评估方法(CAM)和小精神状态检查(MMSE)。术后第一天,第二天和第四天对患者进行CAM和MDAS。确定了MDAS的可靠性和有效性。 >结果:MDAS中文版具有令人满意的内部一致性(α= 0.910)。使用接收器工作特性曲线(ROC)曲线确定最佳中文版MDAS临界点。 ROC分析在描述CAM定义的妄后获得的平均最佳MDAS截止点为7.5,ROC下面积为0.990(95%CI 0.977-1.000,P <0.001)。>结论: MDAS中文版具有良好的信度和效度。术后中文版MDAS截止点评分为7.5的患者可能会出现ir妄。这些结果为将来的大规模研究建立了系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号