首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience >Comparison of nine tractography algorithms for detecting abnormal structural brain networks in Alzheimer’s disease
【2h】

Comparison of nine tractography algorithms for detecting abnormal structural brain networks in Alzheimer’s disease

机译:九种用于检测阿尔茨海默氏病结构脑网络异常的束线照相算法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) involves a gradual breakdown of brain connectivity, and network analyses offer a promising new approach to track and understand disease progression. Even so, our ability to detect degenerative changes in brain networks depends on the methods used. Here we compared several tractography and feature extraction methods to see which ones gave best diagnostic classification for 202 people with AD, mild cognitive impairment or normal cognition, scanned with 41-gradient diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as part of the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) project. We computed brain networks based on whole brain tractography with nine different methods – four of them tensor-based deterministic (FACT, RK2, SL, and TL), two orientation distribution function (ODF)-based deterministic (FACT, RK2), two ODF-based probabilistic approaches (Hough and PICo), and one “ball-and-stick” approach (Probtrackx). Brain networks derived from different tractography algorithms did not differ in terms of classification performance on ADNI, but performing principal components analysis on networks helped classification in some cases. Small differences may still be detectable in a truly vast cohort, but these experiments help assess the relative advantages of different tractography algorithms, and different post-processing choices, when used for classification.
机译:阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)涉及大脑连通性的逐步破坏,而网络分析提供了一种有前途的跟踪和了解疾病进展的新方法。即便如此,我们检测大脑网络退化性变化的能力仍取决于所使用的方法。在这里,我们比较了几种束线描记法和特征提取方法,以发现哪种方法对202例AD,轻度认知障碍或正常认知的人提供了最佳的诊断分类,并采用41梯度扩散加权磁共振成像作为阿尔茨海默氏病神经影像学计划的一部分进行扫描( ADNI)项目。我们基于全脑束描记术,使用九种不同的方法计算了大脑网络-其中四种基于张量的确定性(FACT,RK2,SL和TL),两种基于方向分布函数(ODF)的确定性(FACT,RK2),两种ODF基于概率的方法(Hough和PICo)和一种“球棍”方法(Probtrackx)。从不同的影像学算法得出的脑网络在ADNI的分类性能方面没有差异,但是在某些情况下对网络进行主成分分析有助于分类。在真正巨大的队列中仍然可以检测到很小的差异,但是当用于分类时,这些实验有助于评估不同的射线照相术算法和不同的后处理选择的相对优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号