首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neurology >External Validation of the Diagnosis of TIA (DOT) Score for Identification of TIA in a Chinese Population
【2h】

External Validation of the Diagnosis of TIA (DOT) Score for Identification of TIA in a Chinese Population

机译:TIA(DOT)评分诊断在中国人群中诊断TIA的外部验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Recently, the [diagnosis of transient ischemic attack (TIA), DOT] score has been recognized to be a new tool for non-specialists to diagnose TIA more accurately with the sensitivity and specificity being 89 and 76%, respectively. However, the DOT score has not yet been validated externally in patients with TIA in China.>Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 500 consecutive patients with transient neurological symptoms, who were admitted to the Department of Neurology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital and underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between Jan 2016 and Dec 2018. Patients with transient neurological symptoms were divided into two subgroups: TIA mimic group (N = 140, 28%) and definite cerebrovascular events group including tissue-based TIA (DWI negative, N = 252, 50.4%) and minor stroke (DWI positive, N = 108, 21.6%). The demographic data, clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, and scores of Dawson and DOT were compared between the two groups.>Results: A total of 500 patients with transient neurological symptoms (mean age, 61.1 ± 12.8) were enrolled and 70% (N = 350) were male. Comparing with TIA mimic groups, patients with cerebrovascular events group were more likely to have higher diastolic blood pressure, uric acid and homocysteine, more motor weakness and speech abnormalities, and also scored higher using the Dawson and DOT. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.728 for DOT, with a sensitivity of 70.3% and specificity of 62.9%, respectively.>Conclusion: In patients with transient neurological symptoms, our findings showed that the DOT score had relatively good calibration and discrimination to identify of TIA in a Chinese Population. As a novel tool of TIA identification, further validations are needed in multiple centers with larger samples in China.
机译:>背景:最近,[短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)诊断]评分已被认为是非专业人员更准确地诊断TIA的新工具,其敏感性和特异性分别为89和分别为76%。但是,中国的TIA患者尚未通过DOT评分进行外部验证。>方法:我们回顾性研究了北京朝阳医院神经内科连续收治的500例暂时性神经系统症状患者。并在2016年1月至2018年12月之间进行磁共振成像(MRI)。具有短暂神经系统症状的患者分为两个亚组:TIA模拟组(N = 140,28%)和明确的脑血管事件组,包括基于组织的TIA(DWI阴性) ,N = 252,50.4%)和轻度中风(DWI阳性,N = 108,21.6%)。比较两组的人口统计学数据,临床特征,实验室检查结果以及Dawson和DOT得分。>结果:共有500例暂时性神经系统症状(平均年龄61.1±12.8)的患者入学率和70%(N = 350)是男性。与TIA模仿组相比,脑血管事件组的舒张压,尿酸和高半胱氨酸水平更高,运动无力和言语异常更高,并且使用Dawson和DOT评分更高。 DOT的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.728,敏感性分别为70.3%,特异性为62.9%。>结论:在有短暂神经系统症状的患者中,我们的发现表明DOT评分对中国人群中的TIA进行识别具有相对较好的校准和辨别力。作为TIA识别的一种新颖工具,需要在中国有大量样本的多个中心进行进一步的验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号