首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neurology >Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Recanalization Strategies in Acute Ischemic Stroke
【2h】

Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Recanalization Strategies in Acute Ischemic Stroke

机译:急性缺血性中风的药理学和非药理学再通策略

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

According to the guidelines of the European Stroke Organization (ESO) and the American Stroke Association (ASA), acute stroke patients should be managed at stroke units that include well organized pre- and in-hospital care. In ischemic stroke the restoration of blood flow has to occur within a limited time window that is accomplished by fibrinolytic therapy. Newer generation thrombolytic agents (alteplase, pro-urokinase, reteplase, tenecteplase, desmoteplase) have shorter half-life and are more fibrin-specific. Only alteplase has Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the treatment of acute stroke (1996). The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) trial proved that alteplase was effective in all subtypes of ischemic strokes within the first 3 h. In the European cooperative acute stroke study III trial, intravenous (IV) alteplase therapy was found to be safe and effective (with some restrictions) if applied within the first 3–4.5 h. In middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion additional transcranial Doppler insonication may improve the breakdown of the blood clot. According to the ESO and ASA guidelines, intra-arterial (IA) thrombolysis is an option for recanalization within 6 h of MCA occlusion. Further trials on the IA therapy are needed, as previous studies have involved relatively small number of patients (compared to IV trials) and the optimal IA dose of alteplase has not been determined (20–30 mg is used most commonly in 2 h). Patients undergoing combined (IV + IA) thrombolysis had significantly better outcome than the placebo group or the IV therapy alone in the NINDS trial (Interventional Management of Stroke trials). If thrombolysis fails or it is contraindicated, mechanical devices [e.g., mechanical embolus removal in cerebral ischemia (MERCI)- approved in 2004] might be used to remove the occluding clot. Stenting can also be an option in case of acute internal carotid artery occlusion in the future. An intra-aortic balloon was used to increase the collateral blood flow in the Safety and Efficacy of NeuroFlo Technology in Ischemic Stroke trial (results are under evaluation). Currently, there is no approved effective neuroprotective drug.
机译:根据欧洲卒中组织(ESO)和美国卒中协会(ASA)的指南,应在卒中部门对急性卒中患者进行管理,包括组织良好的院前和院内护理。在缺血性中风中,血流的恢复必须在通过纤溶疗法完成的有限时间窗口内发生。新一代溶栓剂(阿替普酶,尿激酶原,瑞替普酶,替奈普酶,去氨普酶)的半衰期更短,并且对血纤蛋白的特异性更高。只有阿替普酶获得了美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的批准用于治疗急性中风(1996)。美国国家神经系统疾病和中风研究所(NINDS)的试验证明,阿替普酶在前3小时内对所有缺血性中风的亚型均有效。在一项欧洲合作性急性卒中研究III试验中,发现静脉内(IV)阿替普酶治疗在头3–4.5 h内应用是安全有效的(有一定限制)。在大脑中动脉(MCA)阻塞中,额外的经颅多普勒超声可改善血液凝块的破坏。根据ESO和ASA指南,动脉内(IA)溶栓是在MCA闭塞后6小时内重新通气的一种选择。由于先前的研究仅涉及相对较少的患者(与IV试验相比),并且尚未确定阿替普酶的最佳IA剂量(2?h中最常用20-30 mg),因此需要进一步的IA治疗试验。在NINDS试验(卒中的介入治疗试验)中,接受联合(IV + IA)溶栓治疗的患者的结局明显优于安慰剂组或单独进行IV治疗。如果溶栓失败或禁忌使用机械设备[例如,2004年批准的脑缺血中机械性栓子去除]来清除阻塞血块。如果将来发生急性颈内动脉阻塞,也可以选择支架。 NeuroFlo 技术在缺血性卒中试验中使用主动脉内球囊增加侧支血流(结果正在评估中)。当前,没有批准的有效神经保护药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号