首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neuroscience >Classical Statistics and Statistical Learning in Imaging Neuroscience
【2h】

Classical Statistics and Statistical Learning in Imaging Neuroscience

机译:影像神经科学中的古典统计学和统计学习

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Brain-imaging research has predominantly generated insight by means of classical statistics, including regression-type analyses and null-hypothesis testing using t-test and ANOVA. Throughout recent years, statistical learning methods enjoy increasing popularity especially for applications in rich and complex data, including cross-validated out-of-sample prediction using pattern classification and sparsity-inducing regression. This concept paper discusses the implications of inferential justifications and algorithmic methodologies in common data analysis scenarios in neuroimaging. It is retraced how classical statistics and statistical learning originated from different historical contexts, build on different theoretical foundations, make different assumptions, and evaluate different outcome metrics to permit differently nuanced conclusions. The present considerations should help reduce current confusion between model-driven classical hypothesis testing and data-driven learning algorithms for investigating the brain with imaging techniques.
机译:脑成像研究主要通过经典统计方法产生见识,包括回归类型分析和使用t检验和ANOVA的原假设检验。在过去的几年中,统计学习方法越来越受欢迎,尤其是对于丰富而复杂的数据应用,包括使用模式分类和稀疏性回归的交叉验证样本外预测。本概念文件讨论了神经影像中常见数据分析场景中的推理依据和算法方法的含义。它追溯到古典统计和统计学习如何起源于不同的历史背景,建立在不同的理论基础上,做出不同的假设以及评估不同的结果度量标准以得出不同的细微差别的结论。当前的考虑因素应有助于减少模型驱动的经典假设测试与数据驱动的学习算法之间的混淆,该算法用于以成像技术研究大脑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号