首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neuroscience >Testing Multi-Alternative Decision Models with Non-Stationary Evidence
【2h】

Testing Multi-Alternative Decision Models with Non-Stationary Evidence

机译:使用非平稳证据测试多选择决策模型

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recent research has investigated the process of integrating perceptual evidence toward a decision, converging on a number of sequential sampling choice models, such as variants of race and diffusion models and the non-linear leaky competing accumulator (LCA) model. Here we study extensions of these models to multi-alternative choice, considering how well they can account for data from a psychophysical experiment in which the evidence supporting each of the alternatives changes dynamically during the trial, in a way that creates temporal correlations. We find that participants exhibit a tendency to choose an alternative whose evidence profile is temporally anti-correlated with (or dissimilar from) that of other alternatives. This advantage of the anti-correlated alternative is well accounted for in the LCA, and provides constraints that challenge several other models of multi-alternative choice.
机译:最近的研究调查了将感知证据集成到决策的过程,并收敛于许多顺序抽样选择模型,例如种族和扩散模型的变体以及非线性泄漏竞争累加器(LCA)模型。在这里,我们考虑到这些模型可以很好地解释来自心理物理实验的数据的情况,我们研究了这些模型对多变量选择的扩展,在该实验中,支持每种选择的证据在试验过程中以动态的方式动态变化。我们发现,参与者表现出倾向于选择一种替代方案的趋势,该替代方案的证据概况在时间上与其他替代方案的证据相关(或与之不同)。在LCA中很好地说明了反相关备选方案的这一优势,并提供了挑战多种其他备选方案的约束条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号