首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Oncology >Repeated Courses of Radiosurgery for New Brain Metastases to Defer Whole Brain Radiotherapy: Feasibility and Outcome With Validation of the New Prognostic Metric Brain Metastasis Velocity
【2h】

Repeated Courses of Radiosurgery for New Brain Metastases to Defer Whole Brain Radiotherapy: Feasibility and Outcome With Validation of the New Prognostic Metric Brain Metastasis Velocity

机译:重复进行新的脑转移瘤治疗以延缓全脑放射治疗的过程:验证新的预后指标脑转移速度的可行性和结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Purpose: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the preferred primary treatment option for patients with a limited number of asymptomatic brain metastases. In case of relapse after initial SRS the optimal salvage treatment is not well defined. Within this retrospective analysis, we investigated the feasibility of repeated courses of SRS to defer Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy (WBRT) and aimed to derive prognostic factors for patient selection.>Materials and Methods: From 2014 until 2017, 42 patients with 197 brain metastases have been treated with multiple courses of SRS at our institution. Treatment was delivered as single fraction (18 or 20 Gy) or hypo-fractionated (6 fractions with 5 Gy) radiosurgery. Regular follow-up included clinical examination and contrast-enhanced cMRI at 3–4 months' intervals. Besides clinical and treatment related factors, brain metastasis velocity (BMV) as a newly described clinical prognostic metric was included and calculated between first and second treatment.>Results: A median number of 1 lesion (range: 1–13) per course and a median of 2 courses (range: 2–6) per patient were administered resulting in a median of 4 (range: 2–14) metastases treated over time per patient. The median interval between SRS courses was 5.8 months (range: 0.9–35 months). With a median follow-up of 17.4 months (range: 4.6–45.5 months) after the first course of treatment, a local control rate of 84% was observed after 1 year and 67% after 2 years. Median time to out-of-field-brain-failure (OOFBF) was 7 months (95%CI 4–8 months). WBRT as a salvage treatment was eventually required in 7 patients (16.6%). Median overall survival (OS) has not been reached. Grouped by ds-GPA (≤ 2 vs. >2) the survival curves showed a significant split (p = 0.039). OS differed also significantly between BMV-risk groups when grouped into low vs. intermediate/high risk groups (p = 0.025). No grade 4 or 5 acute or late toxicity was observed.>Conclusion: In selected patients with relapse after SRS for brain metastases, repeat courses of SRS were safe and minimized the need for rescue WBRT. The innovative, yet easy to calculate metric BMV may facilitate treatment decisions as a prognostic factor for OS.
机译:>目的:对于有少量无症状脑转移的患者,立体定向放射外科手术(SRS)是首选的主要治疗选择。如果在最初的SRS后复发,则最佳救治方法尚不确定。在这项回顾性分析中,我们调查了重复进行SRS疗程以推迟全脑放射治疗(WBRT)的可行性,并旨在得出患者选择的预后因素。>材料和方法:从2014年至2017年,我们机构已对42例197例脑转移患者进行了多疗程的SRS治疗。治疗以单部分(18或20 Gy)或次分割(6部分,5 Gy)的放射外科手术形式进行。定期随访包括每隔3-4个月进行临床检查和增强对比的cMRI。除临床和治疗相关因素外,还包括脑转移速度(BMV)作为新描述的临床预后指标,并在第一和第二次治疗之间进行计算。>结果:中位数为1个病变(范围:1 – 13)每疗程,每位患者平均接受2个疗程(范围:2–6),导致每位患者随时间推移治疗的中位转移为4(范围:2–14)。 SRS课程之间的平均间隔为5.8个月(范围:0.9-35个月)。在第一个疗程后的中位随访时间为17.4个月(范围:4.6-45.5个月),一年后的局部控制率为84%,两年后为67%。到场外脑衰竭(OOFBF)的中位时间为7个月(95%CI 4-8个月)。最终需要WBRT作为挽救治疗的7例患者(16.6%)。尚未达到中位总体生存期(OS)。按ds-GPA分组(≤2 vs.> 2),生存曲线显示出明显的分裂(p = 0.039)。当将BMV风险组分为低风险组与中/高风险组时,OS也有显着差异(p = 0.025)。没有观察到4级或5级急性或晚期毒性。>结论:在部分因脑转移而发生SRS后复发的患者中,SRS的重复疗程是安全的,并且使抢救WBRT的需要降到最低。创新但易于计算的度量BMV可能有助于将治疗决策作为OS的预后因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号